Publication:
The Point is to Change the World: Enactivist Reflexivity Motivates Resisting the Utopian vs. Scientific Distinction

Thumbnail Image
Files
2023 - Sanches de Oliveira - Enactivist Reflexivity Motivates Resisting the Utopian vs Scientific Distinction.pdf(112.71 KB)
Date
2023
relationships.isAuthorOfPublication
Profile Picture
Person
relationships.isSecondaryAuthorOf
relationships.isDirectorOf
Authors
Sanches de Oliveira, Guilherme
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
Filosofía
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
The distinction Meyer and Brancazio offer between utopian and scientific projects within enactivism is a helpful addition to the more well-established differentiation between enactivist strands. However, I propose that the distinction works well only as an interpretive lens for looking at enactivism from the outside. In contrast, considered “from the inside” or in light of enactivist commitments, enactivism has good reasons to challenge the currently dominant assumptions about science and philosophy that underlie the distinction.
publication.page.subject
Enactivism , Pragmatism , Philosophy , Science , Reflexivity , Theory , Practice
Citation
Sanches de Oliveira, G. (2023). The point is to change the world: Enactivist reflexivity motivates resisting the utopian vs. scientific distinction. Constructivist Foundations 19(1): 24–27. https://constructivist.info/19/1/024
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10201/210541
item.page.embargo
Collections
Artículos
Ir a Estadísticas