Publication: La pérdida de la vivienda habitual en la doctrina del TEDH: una injerencia extrema en el derecho al respeto del domicilio.
Authors
Macho Carro, Alberto
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6018/analesderecho.452701
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
La vivienda habitual ha encontrado una importante vía de tutela en la interpretación
extensiva que el TEDH ha venido haciendo del artículo 8 CEDH. Esta exégesis ha permitido
ampliar su contenido hasta incluir en él algunas vertientes más sociales de lo habitual en un
clásico derecho de libertad. En concreto, desde Connors c. Reino Unido, el TEDH ha sostenido
que esta disposición impone una serie de obligaciones positivas sobre los Estados parte cuando
una persona corra el riesgo de perder su vivienda habitual, incluso si tal pérdida tiene lugar
conforme a causas legalmente tasadas. Además, el Tribunal ha ido desarrollando en su
jurisprudencia el contenido de estas obligaciones, que en principio implicaban exigencias
puramente procedimentales, para irlas dotando de un contenido más sustantivo en lo que
parece una tímida aproximación a la tutela brindada por ciertos órganos internacionales de
garantía de derechos sociales en materia de vivienda
One´s habitual home has found a relevant way of protection through the ECHR´s interpretation of the right to respect for one´s home (art. 8 ECHR). This interpretation has allowed an extension of the content of this right by including in it some considerations that are more “social” than usual for a classical liberty. In particular, from the case of Connors v. the United Kingdom onwards, the ECHR has held that this right imposes upon States a series of positive obligations when a person risks losing his home, even if this loss is in accordance with national law. Moreover, the ECHR has developed the content of these obligations throughout its case law, evolving from pure procedural requirements to a more substantive approach, in which seems like a shy approximation to the protection of the right to housing granted by some international committees.
One´s habitual home has found a relevant way of protection through the ECHR´s interpretation of the right to respect for one´s home (art. 8 ECHR). This interpretation has allowed an extension of the content of this right by including in it some considerations that are more “social” than usual for a classical liberty. In particular, from the case of Connors v. the United Kingdom onwards, the ECHR has held that this right imposes upon States a series of positive obligations when a person risks losing his home, even if this loss is in accordance with national law. Moreover, the ECHR has developed the content of these obligations throughout its case law, evolving from pure procedural requirements to a more substantive approach, in which seems like a shy approximation to the protection of the right to housing granted by some international committees.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. CC BY 4.0