Publication: Taller de software gratuito jamovi frente al comercial IBM SPSS en residentes de medicina que cursan un postgrado de investigación: una experiencia docente
Authors
Santabárbara Serrano, Javier ; Lasheras, Isabel ; Rubio, Encarnación
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Centro de Estudios en Educación Médica de la Universidad de Murcia (CeuEM) y Editum (Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia)
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.426491
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
Objetivo: Determinar la percepción que los residentes en medicina que cursan estudios de postgrado tienen hacia el uso de software estadístico libre como jamovi frente a uno comercial como IBM SPSS. Metodología: Estudio observacional, de corte transversal y descriptivo, en el que se administró una encuesta a los asistentes a un taller de uso de jamovi.Resultados:Sobre una escala de valoración de 5 puntos, los asistentes valoraronpositivamente la utilización de jamovi, ya que, frente a IBM SPSS, no sólo les ofrecíatodas sus ventajas (Media = 4,38; p<0,001), sino que les permitía ahorrar tiempo(Media = 3,90; p=0,015) a la vez que se sienten más confiados en los resultados queéste ofrece (Media = 3,76; p = 0,030), aunque advierten que aún quedan muchas rutinas por implementar (Media = 3,31; p=1). Adicionalmente, los residentes se encuentran motivados en el uso presente de jamovi (Media=4,38; p<0,001), incluso planteándose la sustitución de IBM SPSS por jamovi (Media=4,34; p<0,001). Conclusiones:Los alumnos de posgrado en Medicina se muestran favorables areemplazar IBM SPSS por jamovi en su futuro desempeño investigador.
Abstract: Aims: To determine the perception that medical residents who take postgraduatestudies have towards the use of free statistical software such as jamovi versus acommercial one such as IBM SPSS.Methodology: Observational, cross-sectional and descriptive study, in which a surveywas administered to those attending a workshop on the use of jamovi.Results: On a 5-point rating scale, attendees rated the use of jamovi positively, since,compared to IBM SPSS, not only offered them all their advantages, but also it allowedthem to save time (Mean = 3.90; p = 0.015) while feeling more confident in the resultsthat it offers (Mean = 3.76; p = 0.030), although they warn that there are still manyroutines to implement (Mean = 3.31; p = 1). Additionally, residents are motivated bythe current use of jamovi (Mean = 4.38; p <0.001), even considering substituting IBMSPSS for it (Mean = 4.34; p <0.001). Conclusions: Graduate students in Medicine are in favor of replacing IBM SPSS withjamovi in their future research performance.
Abstract: Aims: To determine the perception that medical residents who take postgraduatestudies have towards the use of free statistical software such as jamovi versus acommercial one such as IBM SPSS.Methodology: Observational, cross-sectional and descriptive study, in which a surveywas administered to those attending a workshop on the use of jamovi.Results: On a 5-point rating scale, attendees rated the use of jamovi positively, since,compared to IBM SPSS, not only offered them all their advantages, but also it allowedthem to save time (Mean = 3.90; p = 0.015) while feeling more confident in the resultsthat it offers (Mean = 3.76; p = 0.030), although they warn that there are still manyroutines to implement (Mean = 3.31; p = 1). Additionally, residents are motivated bythe current use of jamovi (Mean = 4.38; p <0.001), even considering substituting IBMSPSS for it (Mean = 4.34; p <0.001). Conclusions: Graduate students in Medicine are in favor of replacing IBM SPSS withjamovi in their future research performance.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. CC BY 4.0