Publication: La noción de daño y su rol en los juicios morales. Un debate abierto
Loading...
Date
2021
Authors
Silva Carrero, Gustavo ; Reyes, Gustavo ; Peña, Gustavo ; Rosas, Alejandro
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/daimon.353921
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
Investigadores pertenecientes a la tradición de la psicología del desarrollo cognitivo han llevado a cabo estudios que sugieren que existe un vínculo entre la percepción de daño y el dominio moral. Frente a esta propuesta unificadora del dominio moral han surgido críticas desde la psicología cultural. Haidt publicó en 1993 uno de los estudios más influyentes en esta línea, en el que afirmaba haber encontrado evidencia que sugiere la existencia de dominios morales no vinculados a la noción de daño. En este artículo se hará una presentación general del debate en torno al contenido del dominio moral. Luego plantearemos y evaluaremos el estudio de Haidt et al. (1993). Por último, expondremos resultados experimentales que cuestionan las conclusiones de ese estudio y sugieren que el debate sigue abierto.
Researchers belonging to the tradition of cognitive-developmental psychology have suggested in their studies that the perception of harm is central to the moral domain. This unifying proposal has provoked the criticisms of researchers working in Cultural Psychology. Haidt published in 1993 a very influential study, claiming to have found evidence for the existence of moral domains not linked to the notion of harm. In this paper, we briefly present the debate around the content of the moral domains. We then critically examine the study by Haidt et al. (1993). Finally, we present experimental results that question the conclusions of that study and suggest that the debate is still open.
Researchers belonging to the tradition of cognitive-developmental psychology have suggested in their studies that the perception of harm is central to the moral domain. This unifying proposal has provoked the criticisms of researchers working in Cultural Psychology. Haidt published in 1993 a very influential study, claiming to have found evidence for the existence of moral domains not linked to the notion of harm. In this paper, we briefly present the debate around the content of the moral domains. We then critically examine the study by Haidt et al. (1993). Finally, we present experimental results that question the conclusions of that study and suggest that the debate is still open.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. CC BY 4.0