Publication: Aion e historiografía en la obra de Manfredo Tafuri
Authors
León Casero, Jorge
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
La obra de Manfredo Tafuri puede
ser vista como una teoría temporal de la modernidad
(s. XV-XX) opuesta a otras versiones más
puramente racionalistas de la misma, como las
de Mumford o Weber. Para su construcción dentro
del ámbito de la historia de la arquitectura
y del arte, y realizado desde un punto de vista
prominentemente temporal, Tafuri despliega
unas categorías óntico-temporales que le sitúan
directamente dentro del ámbito de filósofos
como Althusser, Deleuze, o Cacciari, todos ellos
inmersos en la crítica historiográfica realizada a
las diversas continuaciones de los planteamientos
cronológicos y teleológicos desarrollados desde
Hegel y Dilthey en adelante.
Abstract: The work of Manfredo Tafuri can be seen as a temporary theory of modernity (s. XV-XX) as opposed to other more purely rationalistic theories such as those of Mumford or Weber. For its contruction within the sphere of the history of architecture and of Art and carried out from a prominently temporary point of view, Tafuri uses some ontic-temporary categories which place his work within the sphere of philosophers such as Althusser, Deleuze or Cacciari. All of them are part of the histographic criticism carried out on the diverse sequels of the chronological and teleological proposals developed from Hegel and Dilthey onwards.
Abstract: The work of Manfredo Tafuri can be seen as a temporary theory of modernity (s. XV-XX) as opposed to other more purely rationalistic theories such as those of Mumford or Weber. For its contruction within the sphere of the history of architecture and of Art and carried out from a prominently temporary point of view, Tafuri uses some ontic-temporary categories which place his work within the sphere of philosophers such as Althusser, Deleuze or Cacciari. All of them are part of the histographic criticism carried out on the diverse sequels of the chronological and teleological proposals developed from Hegel and Dilthey onwards.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.