Publication: La conciliación de la vida familiar y laboral : comentario de la Sentencia de 19 de diciembre de 2022 del TSJ de Madrid.
Authors
Martínez García Donas, Araceli
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Colex
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
La sentencia de la Sala de lo Social del TSJ Madrid (sección 5ª) núm. 731/2022, de 19 de diciembre, resuelve el recurso de suplicación número 385/2022, interpuesto por la trabajadora contra la sentencia del Juzgado de lo Social del mismo asunto que desestimaba su petición de adaptación laboral para poder atender al mayor de sus dos hijos, ambos menores de edad, en lo que respecta a la actividad extraescolar de fútbol. El TSJ de Madrid pondera los intereses de ambas partes y concluye que no procede acceder a lo solicitado por la trabajadora al concebir el tribunal la actividad extraescolar como facultativa. También es objeto de análisis en este comentario el deber de corresponsabilidad parental, la conciliación de la vida familiar y laboral del artículo 34.8 ET y la igualdad laboral entre trabajadores y trabajadoras.
The judgment of the Labour Room of TSJ Madrid (section 5) no. 731/2022, of December 19, resolves the appeal number 385/2022, filed by the worker against the Labour Court of the same matter that dismissed her request for work adaptation to be able to care for the eldest of her two children, both minors, with regard to extracurricular football activity. The TSJ of Madrid weighs the interests of both parties and concludes that it is not appropriate to accede to what was requested by the worker when the court conceives the extracurricular activity as optional. Also analyzed in this commentary is the duty of parental co-responsibility, the reconciliation of family and work life in article 34.8 ET and labor equality between male and female workers.
The judgment of the Labour Room of TSJ Madrid (section 5) no. 731/2022, of December 19, resolves the appeal number 385/2022, filed by the worker against the Labour Court of the same matter that dismissed her request for work adaptation to be able to care for the eldest of her two children, both minors, with regard to extracurricular football activity. The TSJ of Madrid weighs the interests of both parties and concludes that it is not appropriate to accede to what was requested by the worker when the court conceives the extracurricular activity as optional. Also analyzed in this commentary is the duty of parental co-responsibility, the reconciliation of family and work life in article 34.8 ET and labor equality between male and female workers.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Revista justicia & trabajo, N. 2, 2023, p. 187-193.
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/