Publication: La revolución como arte factus lingüístico.
Breve reflexión sobre una paradoja
Authors
Pérez Toribio, Juan Carlos
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
Description
Abstract
Resumen: Aunque Aristóteles llegó a calificar
como «revolución» el cambio violento de
las politeias griegas y Arendt, al revisar el
uso moderno del término, ve a ésta como el
surgimiento de una inevitable y desconocida forma
de gobierno que, a través también de la violencia,
busca la libertad e igualdad política de todos los
ciudadanos, fue Ortega quien se atrevió a aseverar
que lo menos esencial de las revoluciones es la
violencia , apuntando con ello a la aparición de un
discurso y una narrativa que quebranta y modifica
nuestra percepción del mundo. Sin embargo, a
pesar de mantener dicha intención quebrantadora,
el discurso revolucionario parece haberse
convertido en ciertas zonas de Latinoamérica
en un arte factus lingüístico —término que usó
también Ortega— que sirve a la concentración del
poder y la ideología ( en el sentido usado por Teun
van Dijk) de un grupo social específico.
Abstract: Although Aristotle came to qualify as a «revolution» violent change of the Greek polity and Arendt, reviewing the modern use of the term, sees this as the emergence of an inevitable and unknown form of government, also through violence, seek freedom and political equality of all citizens, was Ortega who dared to assert that the least essential of revolutions is the violence, pointing to the emergence of this discourse and narrative breaks and changes our perception of the world. However, despite this intention to keep disruptive, revolutionary discourse seems to have become in parts of Latin America in a language factus art — a term also used by Ortega — serving concentration of power and ideology (in the sense used by Teun van Dijk) of a particular social group.
Abstract: Although Aristotle came to qualify as a «revolution» violent change of the Greek polity and Arendt, reviewing the modern use of the term, sees this as the emergence of an inevitable and unknown form of government, also through violence, seek freedom and political equality of all citizens, was Ortega who dared to assert that the least essential of revolutions is the violence, pointing to the emergence of this discourse and narrative breaks and changes our perception of the world. However, despite this intention to keep disruptive, revolutionary discourse seems to have become in parts of Latin America in a language factus art — a term also used by Ortega — serving concentration of power and ideology (in the sense used by Teun van Dijk) of a particular social group.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.