Publication: Teología política y Modernidad: Peterson, Blumenberg y Schmitt
Authors
Navarrete Alonso, Roberto
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/daimon/178431
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
El presente artículo trata de dilucidar el significado del sintagma «teología política» en el pensamiento de C. Schmitt conforme a lo postulado por éste en su homónima doctrina de la soberanía. Para ello se tendrán en cuenta lasnegaciones teológica (Peterson) y científico-filosófica (Blumenberg) de la propuesta schmittiana, así como la respuesta dada por Schmitt a ambas en Teología política II. Tratará de mostrarse así que la teoría schmittiana de la secularización, tal y como ésta fue postulada en 1922, no lleva a cabo una teologización de la política sino que, por el contrario, presupone la muerte de Dios y, en este sentido, afirma la secularidad intrínseca de la Modernidad.
The aim of this paper is to clarify the meaning of Schmitt’s expression «political theo-logy» by discussing the homonymous Schmit-tian doctrine of sovereignty. I will evaluate, on the one hand, the theological (Peterson) and the scientific-philosophical (Blumenberg) critiques of Schmitt and, on the other hand, Schmitt’s answer to both critiques, which can be found in Politi-cal Theology II. I will try to prove that Schmitt’s theory of secularization, as it was proposed in 1922, does not imply a theologization of politics. On the contrary, this theory presupposes the death of God and, therefore, it states that secularity is intrinsic to Modern Age.
The aim of this paper is to clarify the meaning of Schmitt’s expression «political theo-logy» by discussing the homonymous Schmit-tian doctrine of sovereignty. I will evaluate, on the one hand, the theological (Peterson) and the scientific-philosophical (Blumenberg) critiques of Schmitt and, on the other hand, Schmitt’s answer to both critiques, which can be found in Politi-cal Theology II. I will try to prove that Schmitt’s theory of secularization, as it was proposed in 1922, does not imply a theologization of politics. On the contrary, this theory presupposes the death of God and, therefore, it states that secularity is intrinsic to Modern Age.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, nº 65, 2015, p. 63-75
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.