Publication: La Inquisición y la cuestión morisca en la España de Carlos V : ajustes procesales y doctrinales inéditos (1516-1524)
Authors
Kahn, David
item.page.secondaryauthor
Editora Regional de Murcia
item.page.director
Publisher
Murcia : Editora Regional de Murcia
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
Description
Abstract
Si se suele interpretar la templanza del Santo Oficio en materia de mahometismo como consecuencia de factores políticos, sociales y económicos, en este artículo se privilegia la contribución de la jurisprudencia inquisitorial en la definición de las orientaciones penales en tiempos de Carlos V. A raíz de los desmanes cometidos bajo el generalato de Diego de Deza y con la reforma de la práctica judicial impulsada por el cardenal Jiménez de Cisneros, el Santo Oficio definió una línea de acción basada en el acatamiento de un imperativo de conformidad jurídica. Entre 1516 y 1524, ante las ambigüedades teológicas y jurídicas subyacentes a la cuestión morisca y ante las contradicciones en la normativa real, la Inquisición prolongó un proceso de unificación de la práctica jurisprudencial y de ajustes procesales inéditos, cuyo impacto doctrinal fue trascendente en términos de moderación penal y, más ampliamente, de percepción inquisitorial de las manifestaciones heréticas.
If the temperance of the Spanish Inquisition is usually interpreted under a Mohammedan approach as a consequence of political, social and economic factors, this article favours the idea that the Spanish Inquisition’s jurisprudence contributed in the definition of criminal law during the reign of Charles V. At the origins of the outrages committed during the generalship of Diego de Deza and the judicial practice reform triggered by Cardinal Jiménez de Cisneros, the Spanish Inquisition defined a line of action based on the most rigorous compliance with the law actually motivated by an imperative of judicial conformism. Between 1516 and 1524, having to face theological and judicial ambiguities underlying the Morisco question and the contradictions in royal legislation, the Spanish Inquisition willingly delayed the process of unification in judicial practice and unprecedented adjustments relative to judicial administration, which doctrinal impact was transcending in terms of penal restraint and on a wider scale, in the Spanish Inquisition’s perception of heretic manifestations.
If the temperance of the Spanish Inquisition is usually interpreted under a Mohammedan approach as a consequence of political, social and economic factors, this article favours the idea that the Spanish Inquisition’s jurisprudence contributed in the definition of criminal law during the reign of Charles V. At the origins of the outrages committed during the generalship of Diego de Deza and the judicial practice reform triggered by Cardinal Jiménez de Cisneros, the Spanish Inquisition defined a line of action based on the most rigorous compliance with the law actually motivated by an imperative of judicial conformism. Between 1516 and 1524, having to face theological and judicial ambiguities underlying the Morisco question and the contradictions in royal legislation, the Spanish Inquisition willingly delayed the process of unification in judicial practice and unprecedented adjustments relative to judicial administration, which doctrinal impact was transcending in terms of penal restraint and on a wider scale, in the Spanish Inquisition’s perception of heretic manifestations.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.