Publication: Ironía, parrhesía, cinismo y posverdad como despligues de la intención del
discurso.
Authors
Rendón Ángel, Juan Edilberto ; Palacio Mesa, Rubén Darío ; Moreno Mosquera, Victor Julián
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
Description
Abstract
El artículo, empleando un método de interpretación apoyado por revisión documental,
sostiene que, al tener en cuanta la intención, no es posible un discurso que sea
simultáneamente político e irónico. Tiene cinco secciones: primera, un análisis de la
postura que asume el empleo de la ironía en el discurso político; segunda, una
semblanza del ironista y su presencia en política como problemática; tercera, la función o
utilidad negativa y privada de la ironía y su impropiedad política; cuarta, tres modos
propios del discurso político que excluyen y reemplazan la ironía: la parrhesía, el cinismo
y la posverdad; y concluye explicando la inadecuación política de la ironía.
The paper, by means of a hermeneutic method supported by documentary review, states that, takin intent into consideration, it is no possible a discourse simultaneously political and ironic. It has five sections: first, an analysis of the posture assuming the use of irony in political discourse. Second, a profile of the ironist and his presence in politics as troublesome. Third, the negative and private function or use of irony stressing its political impropriety. Fourth, three types proper of political discourse, which exclude and replace irony: parrhesía, cynicism and post-truth. Finally, the paper closes explaining the political inadequateness of irony.
The paper, by means of a hermeneutic method supported by documentary review, states that, takin intent into consideration, it is no possible a discourse simultaneously political and ironic. It has five sections: first, an analysis of the posture assuming the use of irony in political discourse. Second, a profile of the ironist and his presence in politics as troublesome. Third, the negative and private function or use of irony stressing its political impropriety. Fourth, three types proper of political discourse, which exclude and replace irony: parrhesía, cynicism and post-truth. Finally, the paper closes explaining the political inadequateness of irony.
publication.page.subject
Ironía , Identidad , Intenciçon , Parrhesía , Cinismo , Posverdad , Irony , Intent , Selfhood , Straightforward saying , Improper overtalking , Posttruth
Citation
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. Licencia Creative Commons