Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10201/23561

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSantos, María-
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Serrano, Sonia-
dc.contributor.authorManchón Ruiz, Rosa María-
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-25T08:03:04Z-
dc.date.available2011-07-25T08:03:04Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.issn1598-7044-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/23561-
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent24es
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherMurcia, Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicacioneses
dc.relation.ispartofInternational journal of english studies, Vol. 10 (1), 2010es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.subjectSegunda lenguaes
dc.subjectAdquisiciónes
dc.subjectComunicación escritaes
dc.titleThe Differential Effect of Two Types of Direct Written Corrective Feedback on Noticing and Uptake: Reformulation vs. Error Correctiones
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
Appears in Collections:Vol.10 (1), 2010

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
114011-452611-1-PB.pdf332,6 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in Digitum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.