Publication: Revisión bibliográfica sobre la memoria histórica de pandemias anteriores en revisiones de enfermería sobre COVID-19: una realidad secularmente documentada
Authors
León Molina, Joaquín ; Hellin Gil, M. Fuensanta ; Abad Corpa, Eva
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.456511
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
Introducción: Las revisiones sobre COVID-19 deberían reflejar antecedentes históricos de anteriores pandemias. Objetivo: Nos planteamos mapear el contenido de revisiones recientes, en el área de enfermería sobre COVID-19, para comprobar si se hace alusión a crisis sanitarias por epidemias y enfermedades infecciosas. Metodología. Revisión narrativa descriptiva. Se consultaron la Web de la Ciencia, PubMed y Lilacs para identificar las revisiones; se consultó el contenido de los documentos para detectar la presencia de descriptores y términos relativos a las pandemias anteriores al siglo XXI de la humanidad, atendiendo a los criterios de inclusión y objetivos del estudio. Resultados: Sólo en 11 documentos de los 192 identificados se localizaron reseñas pertinentes. Conclusiones: Pueden existir reticencias a la hora de utilizar documentación publicada hace más de un siglo; sin embargo, sería aconsejable no perder la memoria histórica de crisis pandémicas que ha padecido la humanidad durante milenios.
Introduction: Reviews for COVID-19 should reflect historical antecedents from previous pandemics. Objective: We plan to map the content of recent reviews in the nursing area on COVID-19 to see if it refers to health crises due to epidemics and infectious diseases. Methodology: Descriptive narrative review. The Science Web, PubMed and Lilacs were consulted to identify the reviews; The content of the documents was consulted to detect the presence of descriptors and terms related to pandemics prior to the 21st century of humanity, taking into account the inclusion criteria and objectives of the study. Results: Relevant reviews were found only in 11 documents of the 192 identified. Conclusions: There may be reluctance to use documentation published more than a century ago; However, it would be advisable not to lose the historical memory of pandemic crises that humanity has suffered for millennia.
Introduction: Reviews for COVID-19 should reflect historical antecedents from previous pandemics. Objective: We plan to map the content of recent reviews in the nursing area on COVID-19 to see if it refers to health crises due to epidemics and infectious diseases. Methodology: Descriptive narrative review. The Science Web, PubMed and Lilacs were consulted to identify the reviews; The content of the documents was consulted to detect the presence of descriptors and terms related to pandemics prior to the 21st century of humanity, taking into account the inclusion criteria and objectives of the study. Results: Relevant reviews were found only in 11 documents of the 192 identified. Conclusions: There may be reluctance to use documentation published more than a century ago; However, it would be advisable not to lose the historical memory of pandemic crises that humanity has suffered for millennia.
publication.page.subject
Pandemias , Epidemias , Historia , Historia Antigua , Pandemics , Epidemics , History , Ancient History
Citation
Enfermería Global, Vol. 20, nº 3 (2021)
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/