Publication: Mesa 5. Acción y coacción a comienzos del siglo XXI.-Análisis de falacias y malos argumentos en la retórica de las políticas científicas: la controversia de la vacuna contra el VPH
Loading...
Date
2020-07-21
Authors
García Lax, Salvador
item.page.secondaryauthor
Universidad de Murcia
item.page.director
Publisher
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
Description
Abstract
Resumen: Analizamos desde la retórica de la ciencia los argumentos ilícitos que han estado presentes en
la controversia suscitada por motivo de la introducción en el sistema vacunal español de la vacuna contra
el virus del papiloma humano (VPH) en 2008. En la primera parte señalamos carácter político y público
que la ciencia ha adquirido desde mediados del siglo XX. Continuaremos defendiendo, frente a posturas
contrarias, la presencia de una dimensión retórica en la ciencia. Finalmente exponemos algunas
conclusiones del análisis, apoyadas en la teoría de la argumentación de Luis Vega.
Abstract: We analyze, from the rhetoric of science point of view, illicit arguments that have been present in the controversy provoked by introduction of the vaccine against the human papilomavirus (HPV) in the Spanish vacunal system in 2008. Firstly, we indicate political and public character that science has acquired from middle of 20th century. We will continue defending from opposite positions, the presence of a rhetorical dimension in science. Finally we expose some conclusions relied on the theory of Luis Vega's argumentation.
Abstract: We analyze, from the rhetoric of science point of view, illicit arguments that have been present in the controversy provoked by introduction of the vaccine against the human papilomavirus (HPV) in the Spanish vacunal system in 2008. Firstly, we indicate political and public character that science has acquired from middle of 20th century. We will continue defending from opposite positions, the presence of a rhetorical dimension in science. Finally we expose some conclusions relied on the theory of Luis Vega's argumentation.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/