Publication:
Wingate test, when time and overdue fatigue matter: validity and sensitivity of two time-shortened versions

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorHernández Belmonte, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorBuendía-Romero, Ángel
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Cava, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorCourel Ibáñez, Javier
dc.contributor.authorMora-Rodríguez, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Pallarés, Jesús
dc.contributor.departmentActividad Física y Deporte
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-09T08:17:00Z
dc.date.available2025-10-09T08:17:00Z
dc.date.copyright© 2020, bythe authors
dc.date.issued2020-11-11
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to analyze the validity and sensitivity of two time-shortened Wingate anaerobic tests (WAnTs), by means of three phases. In Phase A, 40 participants performed a traditional 30 s WAnT, whereas the first 15 s (WAnT15) and 20 s (WAnT20) were used to elaborate two predictive models. In Phase B, another 30 s WAnT was performed by 15 different volunteers to examine the error of these models (cross-validation). Finally, in Phase C, a 30 s WAnT was registered before and after a 10-week velocity-based training conducted by 22 different participants (training group, TRAIN = 11; control group that fully refrained from any type of training, CONTROL = 11). Power changes (in Watts, W) after this training intervention were used to interpret the sensitivity of the time-shortened WAnT. Adjusted coefficient of determination (R2) was reported for each regression model, whereas the cross-validation analysis included the smallest detectable change (SDC) and bias. Close relationships were found between the traditional 30 s WAnT and both the WAnT15 (R2 = 0.98) and WAnT20 (R2 = 0.99). Cross-validation analysis showed a lower error and bias for WAnT20 (SDC = 9.3 W, bias = −0.1 W) compared to WAnT15 (SDC = 22.2 W, bias = 1.8 W). Lastly, sensitivity to identify individual changes was higher for WAnT20 (TRAIN = 11/11 subjects, CONTROL = 9/11 subjects) than for WAnT15 (TRAIN = 4/11 subjects, CONTROL = 2/11 subjects). These findings suggest that the WAnT20 could become a valid and sensitive protocol to replace the traditional 30 s WAnT.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.format.extent11
dc.identifier.citationAppl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8002
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/app10228002
dc.identifier.eissn2076-3417
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/165469
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidad
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/22/8002
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectPower
dc.subjectAssessment
dc.subjectStrength
dc.subjectPerformance
dc.subjectAnaerobic capacity
dc.subjectResistance training
dc.subject.odsNo relacionado con ningún objetivo de desarrollo sostenible
dc.titleWingate test, when time and overdue fatigue matter: validity and sensitivity of two time-shortened versions
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa4bb5157-12e0-489d-8fb2-ff3b3d5a2c4d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication80de5692-18b8-43b2-a202-ae1faa96659c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya4bb5157-12e0-489d-8fb2-ff3b3d5a2c4d
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Wingate Test,When Time and Overdue FatigueMatter.pdf
Size:
1.59 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.37 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Artículos