Publication: Tratamiento de los neurodatos en Chile : análisis de jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema de Chile.
Authors
Rodrigo Rodríguez Astudillo, Nelson
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones.
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6018/bioderecho.621281
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
La Corte Suprema de Chile se pronunció por primera vez respecto al uso y la recopilación de información referida a la actividad neurológica, en virtud de la apelación a la sentencia que había fallado en contra del Recurso de Protección dictado por la Ilustre Corte de Apelaciones de Santiago, en Causa Rol 49852-2022, deducido por el exsenador don Guido Girardi en contra de la empresa internacional Emotiv Inc., comercializadora del producto “Insight”, dispositivo inalámbrico compuesto por una cinta que se adosa a la cabeza como una especie de auricular, con sensores de goma de tres puntas, que recaban información sobre la actividad eléctrica del cerebro, obteniendo datos sobre gestos, movimientos, preferencias, tiempos de reacción y actividad cognitiva de quien lo usa.
Abstract: The Supreme Court of Chile ruled for the first time regarding the use and collection of information related to neurological activity, by virtue of the appeal to the sentence that had ruled against the Protection Appeal issued by the Illustrious Court of Appeals of Santiago, in Case N°. 49852-2022, filed by former senator Mr. Guido Girardi against the international company Emotiv Inc., marketer of the “Insight” product, a wireless device composed of a ribbon that is attached to the head as a kind of headset, with three-prong rubber sensors, which collect information about the electrical activity of the brain, obtaining data on gestures, movements, preferences, reaction times and cognitive activity of the user.
Abstract: The Supreme Court of Chile ruled for the first time regarding the use and collection of information related to neurological activity, by virtue of the appeal to the sentence that had ruled against the Protection Appeal issued by the Illustrious Court of Appeals of Santiago, in Case N°. 49852-2022, filed by former senator Mr. Guido Girardi against the international company Emotiv Inc., marketer of the “Insight” product, a wireless device composed of a ribbon that is attached to the head as a kind of headset, with three-prong rubber sensors, which collect information about the electrical activity of the brain, obtaining data on gestures, movements, preferences, reaction times and cognitive activity of the user.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Bioderecho.es, n. 19, enero-julio 2024.
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/