Publication: Las cuatro muertes de Cleonice: poder, sexo, violencia y fantasmas
Loading...
Date
2019-09-24
Authors
Sánchez-Mañas, Carmen
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universitat de València
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
© 2019 Universitat de València. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This document is the Published Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Studia Philologica Valentina.
Abstract
La tradición griega vincula la muerte del regente Pausanias de Esparta con fantasmas. En este artículo nos centramos en el conocido episodio que involucra al mismo Pausanias y a una doncella bizantina, transmitido por Aristodemo, Plutarco y Pausanias el Periegeta. La multiplicidad de versiones exige un análisis comparativo, que realizamos teniendo en cuenta los tres espacios donde se desarrolla la acción narrativa (cívico, íntimo y ritual). Los resultados indican una concordancia entre Plutarco y Pausanias el Periegeta, así como una disonancia entre ellos dos y Aristodemo. Esta diferencia afecta especialmente al tratamiento del personaje de la doncella, propiamente fantasmal en Plutarco y Pausanias el Periegeta, pero no en Aristodemo. ------------
Greek tradition links the death of regent Pausanias of Sparta with ghosts. In this paper, we focus on the well-known episode that revolves around Pausanias himself and a Byzantine maiden and is transmitted by Aristodemus, Plutarch and Pausanias Periegetes. The multiplicity of versions demands a comparative analysis, which we carry out taking into account the three spaces where the narrative action takes place (civic, intimate and ritual spaces). Results indicate a concordance between Plutarch and Pausanias Periegetes, as well as a dissonance between them and Aristodemus. This difference especially affects the narrative treatment of the maiden, a ghost properly so-called in Plutarch and Pausanias Periegetes, but not in Aristodemus.
Greek tradition links the death of regent Pausanias of Sparta with ghosts. In this paper, we focus on the well-known episode that revolves around Pausanias himself and a Byzantine maiden and is transmitted by Aristodemus, Plutarch and Pausanias Periegetes. The multiplicity of versions demands a comparative analysis, which we carry out taking into account the three spaces where the narrative action takes place (civic, intimate and ritual spaces). Results indicate a concordance between Plutarch and Pausanias Periegetes, as well as a dissonance between them and Aristodemus. This difference especially affects the narrative treatment of the maiden, a ghost properly so-called in Plutarch and Pausanias Periegetes, but not in Aristodemus.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Studia Philologica Valentina, 2019, Vol. 21, n.s. 18, pp. 231-242
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/