Relief alternatives during resuscitation: instructions to teach bystanders. A randomized control trial

Pujalte Jesús, María José; Leal Costa, César; Ruzafa Martínez, María; Ramos Morcillo, Antonio Jesús; Díaz Agea, José Luis

Publication:
Relief alternatives during resuscitation: instructions to teach bystanders. A randomized control trial

dc.contributor.author	Pujalte Jesús, María José
dc.contributor.author	Leal Costa, César
dc.contributor.author	Ruzafa Martínez, María
dc.contributor.author	Ramos Morcillo, Antonio Jesús
dc.contributor.author	Díaz Agea, José Luis
dc.contributor.department	Enfermería
dc.date.accessioned	2024-03-01T09:41:38Z
dc.date.available	2024-03-01T09:41:38Z
dc.date.issued	2020-07-30
dc.description	©2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This document is the Published, version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155495	es
dc.description.abstract	To analyze the quality of resuscitation (CPR) performed by individuals without training after receiving a set of instructions (structured and unstructured/intuitive) from an expert in a simulated context, the specific objective was to design a simple and structured CPR learning method on-site. An experimental study was designed, consisting of two random groups with a post-intervention measurement in which the experimental group (EG) received standardized instructions, and the control group (CG) received intuitive or non-standardized instructions, in a public area simulated scenario. Statistically significant differences were found (p < 0.0001) between the EG and the CG for variables: time needed to give orders, pauses between chest compressions and ventilations, depth, overall score, chest compression score, and chest recoil. The average depth of the EG was 51.1 mm (SD 7.94) and 42.2 mm (SD 12.04) for the CG. The chest recoil median was 86.32% (IQR 62.36, 98.87) for the EG, and 58.3% (IQR 27.46, 84.33) in the CG. The use of a sequence of simple, short and specific orders, together with observation-based learning makes possible the execution of chest compression maneuvers that are very similar to those performed by rescuers, and allows the teaching of the basic notions of ventilation. The structured order method was shown to be an on-site learning opportunity when faced with the need to maintain high-quality CPR in the presence of an expert resuscitator until the arrival of emergency services.	es
dc.format	application/pdf	es
dc.format.extent	11	es
dc.identifier.doi	https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155495
dc.identifier.eisbn	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020, 17, 5495	es
dc.identifier.issn	Print: 1661-7827
dc.identifier.issn	Electronic: 1660-4601
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10201/139799
dc.language	eng	es
dc.publisher	MDPI	es
dc.relation	Sin financiación externa a la Universidad	es
dc.relation.publisherversion	https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5495	es
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess	es
dc.rights	Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/	*
dc.subject	Cardiopulmonary resuscitation	es
dc.subject	Chest compression	es
dc.subject	Method	es
dc.subject	Experiential learning	es
dc.subject	Observation	es
dc.subject	CPR	es
dc.subject.other	CDU::6 - Ciencias aplicadas::61 - Medicina	es
dc.title	Relief alternatives during resuscitation: instructions to teach bystanders. A randomized control trial	es
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article	es
dspace.entity.type	Publication	es