Publication:
Drug cost avoidance analysis of cancer clinical trials in Spain: a study on cost contributors and their impact

dc.contributor.authorSánchez Martínez, Domingo Antonio
dc.contributor.authorSalas Lucia, Federico
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Hanzi
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Carreño, Paula
dc.contributor.authorAlonso Romero, José Luis
dc.contributor.departmentMedicina
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-05T11:42:56Z
dc.date.available2024-11-05T11:42:56Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-26
dc.description© The Author(s) 2022. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This document is the Published version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in BMC Health Services Research. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08222-9
dc.description.abstractObjective Analyze the cost contributors and their impact on the drug cost avoidance (DCA) resulting from cancer clinical trials over the period of 2015–2020 in a tertiary-level hospital in Spain (HCUVA). Methods We performed a cross-sectional, observational, retrospective study of a total of 53 clinical trials with 363 patients enrolled. We calculated the DCA from the price of the best standard of care (i.e.: drugs that the institution would otherwise fund). A linear regression model was used to determine cost contributors and estimate their impact. Results The total DCA was ~ 4.9 million euros (31 clinical trials; 177 enrollees), representing ~ 30% and ~ 0,05% approximately of the annual pharmaceutical expenditures at the HCUVA and for the Spanish Health System, respectively. Cancer type analysis showed that lung cancer had the highest average DCA by trial, indicating that treatments in these trials were the most expensive. Linear regression analysis showed that the number of patients in a trial did not significantly affect that trial's DCA. Instead, cancer type, phase trials, and intention of treatment were significant cost contributors to DCA. Compared to digestive cancer trials, breast and lung trials were significantly more expensive, (p < 0.05 and p < 0.1, respectively). Phase III trials were more expensive than Phase II (p < 0.01) and adjuvant trials were less expensive than palliative (p < 0.05). Conclusion We studied cost contributors that significantly impacted the estimated DCA from cancer clinical trials. Our work provides the groundwork to explore DCA contributors with potential to enhance public relations material and serve as a negotiating tool for budgeting, thus playing an important role to inform decisions about resource allocation.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent7es
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08222-9
dc.identifier.eisbnBMC Health Services Research, 2022, Vol. 22: 948es
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1472-6963
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/146003
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidades
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-022-08222-9
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectHospital managementes
dc.subjectLinear regressiones
dc.subjectHealthcare costses
dc.subjectSustainabilityes
dc.subjectClinical Trialses
dc.subjectOncologyes
dc.titleDrug cost avoidance analysis of cancer clinical trials in Spain: a study on cost contributors and their impactes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s12913-022-08222-9.pdf
Size:
843.93 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.26 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections