Browsing by Subject "Diseño educativo"

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Academic tasks for fostering the PLE in Higher Education : international insights on learning design and agency
    (Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones, 2023) Castañeda, Linda; Marín, Victoria I.; Scherer Bassani, Patrícia; Camacho, Araceli; Forero, Ximena; Pérez, Lucila
    The concept of Personal Learning Environment (PLE) is considered as a possible lens to understand and analyse learning conditions in different educational contexts from an ecological perspective, connecting with student's agency in their learning. Previous literature shows partial approaches on how it is implemented in higher education practice, which leave a research gap regarding how it is promoted from the learning design considering student agency. It is in this space that the present study is framed. Through a qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews have been conducted with 20 faculty members from 5 different countries, to find out about the educational tasks that promote the PLE in their courses. A sample of 34 academic tasks has been analysed through a coding system based on the learning design, the parts of the PLE and the student agency involved. The results show that the implementation of tasks for the promotion of the PLE still has room for improvement, affecting aspects of assessment, the promotion of metacognition and student self-direction. As conclusions, future lines of work that can be considered in practice and research on PLE are provided.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Estrategias de aprendizaje y eLearning. Un apunte para la fundamentación del diseño educativo en los entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Consideraciones para la reflexión y el debate. Introducción al estudio de las estrategias y estilos de aprendizaje
    (Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones, 2008) Esteban Albert, Manuel; Zapata-Ros, Miguel
    En este artículo se abordan conceptos y realidades de vigencia como son las estrategias y estilos de aprendizaje, así como el concepto de metacognición. Además se plantea desde el punto de vista de si pueden servir para fundamentar el diseño educativo en actividades de eLearning y en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje (EVAs). Se pone de relieve el papel de la metacognición en el eLearning sobre todo pensando en la selección, secuenciación y organización de los contenidos atendiendo a las características y situaciones de aprendizaje específicas de los alumnos. El carácter autodidáctico y favorecedor del aprendizaje autónomo que poseen estos entornos parece requerir, más que ningún otro, de un buen conocimiento de los propios recursos para aprender. Pero, ¿es posible, o fácil, inducir elementos que incrementen esta ineludible e intransferible función del aprendiz situado en estos entornos? ¿Cómo o con qué herramientas cognitivas o de regulación del propio conocimiento? ¿Bajo que criterios o condiciones se podrían incorporar en las actividades de Elearning elementos de control de la actividad cognitiva de los sujetos? ¿Las guías didácticas y particularmente las especificaciones del learning design pueden cumplir esas funciones? ¿Bajo qué criterios o condiciones? Estas son las preguntas que nos planteamos. En cuanto a los estilos de aprendizaje, se plantea: Si, con la información que disponemos acerca de ellos, seríamos capaces de definir los rasgos de un estilo de aprendizaje apropiado para los EVAs., o más bien si es necesario tenerlos en cuenta en el diseño instruccional. ¿Existe pues la suficiente cultura en la dirección de observar y conocer los estilos de aprender de los alumnos para orientar la enseñanza en la dirección de mejorar las condiciones de aprendizaje de los EVAs o hacerlos al menos posibles? ¿Cuáles pueden ser ingredientes esenciales de los entornos de aprendizaje, y del diseño instruccional, para llevar a cabo esa función?
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Estrategias de aprendizaje y eLearning. Un apunte para la fundamentación del diseño educativo en los entornos virtuales de aprendizaje
    (Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones, 2016) Esteban-Albert, Manuel; Zapata-Ros, Miguel
    En este artículo se abordan conceptos y realidades de vigencia como son las estrategias y estilos de aprendizaje, así como el concepto de metacognición. Además se plantea desde el punto de vista de si pueden servir para fundamentar el diseño educativo en actividades de eLearning y en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje (EVA). Se pone de relieve el papel de la metacognición en el eLearning sobre todo pensando en la selección, secuenciación y organización de los contenidos atendiendo a las características y situaciones de aprendizaje específicas de los alumnos. El carácter autodidáctico y favorecedor del aprendizaje autónomo que poseen estos entornos parece requerir, más que ningún otro, de un buen conocimiento de los propios recursos para aprender. Pero, ¿es posible, o fácil, inducir elementos que incrementen esta ineludible e intransferible función del aprendiz situado en estos entornos? ¿Cómo o con qué herramientas cognitivas o de regulación del propio conocimiento? ¿Bajo qué criterios o condiciones se podrían incorporar en las actividades de Elearning elementos de control de la actividad cognitiva de los sujetos? ¿Las guías didácticas y particularmente las especificaciones del learning design pueden cumplir esas funciones? ¿Bajo qué criterios o condiciones? Estas son las preguntas que nos planteamos. En cuanto a los estilos de aprendizaje, se plantea: Si, con la información que disponemos acerca de ellos, seríamos capaces de definir los rasgos de un estilo de aprendizaje apropiado para los EVA, o más bien si es necesario tenerlos en cuenta en el diseño instruccional. ¿Existe pues la suficiente cultura en la dirección de observar y conocer los estilos de aprender de los alumnos para orientar la enseñanza en la dirección de mejorar las condiciones de aprendizaje de los EVA o hacerlos al menos posible? ¿Cuáles pueden ser ingredientes esenciales de los entornos de aprendizaje, y del diseño instruccional, para llevar a cabo esa función?
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Sequencing of contents and learning objects
    (Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones, 2005) Zapata-Ros, Miguel
    In this article we state a vision of selection and sequencing of learning contents in the context of curricular design from a constructivist viewpoint. We point out the importance of having tools and autonomous criteria which lead these processes in the field of web-based formation from our own bases or from external ones and with preeminence over the ones that are derived from the configuration of technological tools. We also stand out this importance from the need to have standard formats for data exchange. Inasmuch as this overstatement is important, it’s of outmost relevance in the context of elearning, it being for general purposes, for formation, for corporate training or for academic formation. It’s also relevant for ruled formation, as well as informal and unruled formation. We also mark the needs stated by the e-learning industry in relation to the instructional design of learning objects, needs which are both a priority and a challenge. Then, we develop the grounding of the theories that rule the procedures for the selection of contents, their basic tenets and the description of the sequencing techniques. In particular, we will focus on three of them: Content Analysis Technique, Task Analysis Technique and Elaboration Theory. Finally, as a conclusion, we will try to enunciate several questions, not developing the answers, though, in this article: Are the concept of Reusable Learning Object (RLO) and the requirements for interdependence of Learning Objects (LO) compatible?. If they are compatible, what are their requirements?
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Sequencing of contents and learning objects - part II
    (Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones, 2006) Zapata-Ros, Miguel
    This is the second part of the article under the same name published in the previous issue of RED. It was then that we stated a vision of the selection and sequencing of learning objects in the context of curricular planning, from the constructivist perspective. In the field of web-based training, we pointed out the importance of having tools and autonomous criteria that guide this process on our own and external basis , above the prescriptions of technological tools, and from the need of having standardized formats to exchange data. The above mentioned becomes more relevant in the field of e-learning for general purposes, in the areas of academic formation, corporate and general training. It covers the area of formal, non-formal and informal education as well. We have also mentioned the needs the e-learning industry has to fulfill at present in relation to instructional design of learning objects. These needs are both a priority and a challenge. In the first part of this article we developed the constructivist perspective and the concept of technological tools as educational resources, as well as a revision of concepts that are related to e-learning, learning objects, reusable learning objects (RLO) and reusability. In this part, we’ll deal with the basis for the theories that rule the procedures for selecting contents, the basic presupposition and the description of the sequencing techniques. In particular, we’ll focus on three of them: Content Analysis Technique, Task Analysis Technique, and Elaboration Theory. In our third and last part, we’ll undertake several issues – not trying to solve them but just in their proposal as enunciation: Is the concept of reusable learning object compatible with the requirements of interdependence of the learning contents? If this is so, what are the requirements for those learning contents?
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Sequencing of contents and learning objects - part III
    (Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones, 2006) Zapata Ros, Miguel
    This is the third part of the article under the same name published in the previous issue of RED. It was then that we stated a vision of the selection and sequencing of learning objects in the context of curricular planning, from the constructivist perspective. In the field of web-based training, we pointed out the importance of having tools and autonomous criteria that guide this process on our own and on external basis, above the prescriptions of technological tools, and from the need of having standardized formats to exchange data. The above mentioned becomes more relevant in the field of e-learning for general purposes, in the areas of academic formation, corporate and general training. It covers the area of formal, non-formal and informal education as well. We have also mentioned the needs the e-learning industry has to fulfil at present in relation to instructional design of learning objects. These needs are both a priority and a challenge. In the first part of this article we developed the constructivist perspective and the concept of technological tools as educational resources, as well as a revision of concepts that are related to e-learning, learning objects, reusable learning objects (RLO) and reusability. In the second part, we dealt with the basis for the theories that rule the procedures for selecting contents, the basic presupposition and the description of the sequencing techniques. In particular, we focused on three of them: Content Analysis Technique, Task Analysis Technique, and Elaboration Theory. In our third and last part, we undertake several issues – not trying to solve them but just in their proposal as enunciation: Is the concept of reusable learning object compatible with the requirements of interdependence of the learning contents? If this is so, what are the requirements for those learning contents?