Publication: Una lectura ontológica de Fenomenología de la percepción
Authors
Riera Jaume, Pedro
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/daimon/191181
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
Fenomenología de la percepción ha sido acusada de no elevar la descripción feno-menológica a un orden ontológico. En este artículo intento demostrar que, pese a la falta de un planteo específico del problema ontológico, hay abundantes muestras en la obra de una fenomenología de la fenomenología que al llevar a origen sus conceptos fundamentales, libera otro modo de entender tiempo, espacio o ser. El esbozo de una ontología implícita –como reconoce Merleau-Ponty– en las descripciones de Fenomenología de la percepción, es lo que trata de explicitar este artículo señalando como rasgos fundamentales la dimensionalidad, el “ser de encuentro o de relación”, la originariedad o el campo de presencia.
Phenomenology of perception has been often accused of not raising its phenomenological descriptions to an ontological order. In this paper I try to demonstrate that, although the lack of a clear ontological issue, there are in the book enough examples of a phenomenology of the phenomenology that, taking the mainly concepts to the original fountain, free another way of conceiving time, space or being. The sketch of an implicit ontology –so recognized by Merleau-Ponty– in the descriptions of this book, is what this paper tries to explain showing as fundamental features the dimensionality, the being of meeting or relation, the originality or the field of presence.
Phenomenology of perception has been often accused of not raising its phenomenological descriptions to an ontological order. In this paper I try to demonstrate that, although the lack of a clear ontological issue, there are in the book enough examples of a phenomenology of the phenomenology that, taking the mainly concepts to the original fountain, free another way of conceiving time, space or being. The sketch of an implicit ontology –so recognized by Merleau-Ponty– in the descriptions of this book, is what this paper tries to explain showing as fundamental features the dimensionality, the being of meeting or relation, the originality or the field of presence.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 2015, nº. 66, pp. 109-120
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd 4.0 International