Publication: Opiniones de profesores y estudiantes de enfermería respecto al
contenido de las tutorías
Authors
Guerra Martín, María Dolores ; Lima Serrano, Marta ; Lima Rodríguez, Joaquín Salvador
item.page.secondaryauthor
Enfermería
item.page.director
Publisher
Murcia: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
RESUMEN
Objetivos: Comparar opiniones de profesores y estudiantes de enfermería de la Universidad de Sevilla
(España) sobre las cuestiones abordadas en las tutorías, e identificar preferencias temáticas de los
estudiantes.
Método: Se aplicaron cuestionarios previamente validados a 181 profesores y 1015 estudiantes. Se
realizó análisis descriptivo y bivariante apoyado en SPSS 18.0 (p<0,05) y para la pregunta sobre
preferencias temáticas de los estudiantes, se realizó un análisis cualitativo apoyado en ATLAS.ti 6.
Resultados: 56,7% profesoras, edad media 46,8 años. 77,3% alumnas, edad media 21,4 años. 93,4%
profesores y 63,2% de estudiantes afirmaron abordar cuestiones académicas, y 62,4% y 36%,
respectivamente, sobre cualquier tema (p<0,05). Se observaron diferencias favorables a los profesores
con formación en tutorías (p<0,05). Los de mayor grado académico y tiempo completo abordaron más
cuestiones académicas y universitarias mientras que los de menor grado académico y tiempo parcial
las asistenciales (p<0,05). Hubo 868 comentarios sobre preferencias temáticas de los estudiantes,
subrayando los temas académicos (62,4%) y los profesionalizantes (18,2%).
Conclusión: Las características sociodemográficas y la formación previa sobre tutorías del
profesorado influyen en el abordaje temático en la tutoría. Es importante dar a conocer las opiniones de
estos colectivos y fomentar la formación del profesorado en este tópico.
ABSTRACT Objectives: To compare opinions of nursing professors and students of the University of Seville (Spain) on the themes addressed in the mentoring program, and to identify subject preferences of the students. Method: Previously validated questionnaires were given to 181 professors and 1015 students. A descriptive and bivariate analysis was conducted, supported by SPSS 18.0 (p<0.05), and for the issue of subject preferences of the students, a qualitative analysis was conducted supported by ATLAS.ti 6. Results: 56.7% female professors, mean age 46.8 years. 77.3% female students, mean age 21.4 years. Of them, 93.4% of the professors and 63.2% of the students affirmed addressing academic issues and 62.4% and 36%, respectively, addressed any subject (p<0.05), differences were observed in favour of the professors with training in mentoring (p<0.05). Those with a higher academic degree and who teach full time addressed more academic and university issues while those with a lower academic degree and teaching part time addressed the health care subjects (p<0.05). There were 868 comments on subject preferences of the students, highlighting the academic subjects (62.4%) and the professionalization subjects (18.2%). Conclusion: The sociodemographic characteristics and the professors’ prior training in mentoring influence the subject matter addressed in the mentoring program. It is important to make the opinions of these collectives known and to promote the training of the professors on this topic.
ABSTRACT Objectives: To compare opinions of nursing professors and students of the University of Seville (Spain) on the themes addressed in the mentoring program, and to identify subject preferences of the students. Method: Previously validated questionnaires were given to 181 professors and 1015 students. A descriptive and bivariate analysis was conducted, supported by SPSS 18.0 (p<0.05), and for the issue of subject preferences of the students, a qualitative analysis was conducted supported by ATLAS.ti 6. Results: 56.7% female professors, mean age 46.8 years. 77.3% female students, mean age 21.4 years. Of them, 93.4% of the professors and 63.2% of the students affirmed addressing academic issues and 62.4% and 36%, respectively, addressed any subject (p<0.05), differences were observed in favour of the professors with training in mentoring (p<0.05). Those with a higher academic degree and who teach full time addressed more academic and university issues while those with a lower academic degree and teaching part time addressed the health care subjects (p<0.05). There were 868 comments on subject preferences of the students, highlighting the academic subjects (62.4%) and the professionalization subjects (18.2%). Conclusion: The sociodemographic characteristics and the professors’ prior training in mentoring influence the subject matter addressed in the mentoring program. It is important to make the opinions of these collectives known and to promote the training of the professors on this topic.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.