Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10201/66708

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorCarrió-Pastor, María Luisa-
dc.contributor.authorMartín Marchante, Beatriz-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-21T09:47:24Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-21T09:47:24Z-
dc.date.created2018-
dc.date.issued2019-01-21-
dc.identifier.issn1989-6131-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/66708-
dc.description.abstractThe work at hand is part of a wider study the aim of which was to determine what kind of factors influence failures in pragmatic items of an online adaptive placement test taken by a group of 34 Spanish students in their first year at university. A preceding analysis (Carrió & Martín, 2016) showed the type of personal factors, such as lack of vocabula ry, that caused the exam takers failures in the pragmatic part of the test according to their own perception. In this paper, we go deeper and analyze those specific items holding higher percentage of failures so that we can reach some conclusions about its content validity and also about the degree of relationship between these and the pragmatic categories dealt with in the most relevant research carried out in the field of pragmalinguistic testing and assessment.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent21es
dc.languageenges
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal English Studies, Vol. 18(2), 2018es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.subjectPragmaticses
dc.subjectESLes
dc.subjectLanguage testing and assessmentes
dc.subject.otherCDU::8- Lingüística y literatura::81 - Lingüística y lenguases
dc.titleAnalysis of pragmatic items in an ESL online adaptive placement testes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
Aparece en las colecciones:2018, V. 18, N. 2

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
322581-Article Text-1202101-1-10-20181228.pdf351,44 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons