Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-025-01833-w

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorAlonso Sarria, Francisco-
dc.contributor.authorBlanco Bernardeau, Arantzazu-
dc.contributor.authorGomariz Castillo, Francisco-
dc.contributor.authorRomero Díaz, María Asunción-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-12T10:03:16Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-12T10:03:16Z-
dc.date.issued2025-03-11-
dc.identifier.citationEarth Science Informatics, (2025) 18:323es
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 1865-0473-
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1865-0481-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/155840-
dc.description© The Author(s) 2025. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-/4.0/. This document is the Published version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Earth Science Informatics. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-025-01833-w-
dc.description.abstractSoils are a key element in the hydrological cycle through a number of soil properties that are complex to estimate and exhibit considerable spatial variability. Therefore, several techniques have been proposed for their estimation and mapping from point data along a given study area. In this work, four machine learning methods: Random Forest, Support Vector Machines, XGBoost and Multilayer Perceptrons, are used to predict and map the proportions of organic carbon, clay, silt and sand in the soils of the Campo de Cartagena (SE Spain). These models depend on a number of hyperparameters that need to be optimised to maximise accuracy, although this process can lead to overtraining, which affects the generalisability of the models. In this work it was found that neural networks gave the best results in validation, but on the test data the methods based on decision trees, random forest and xgboost were more accurate, although the differences were generally not significant. Accuracy values, as usual for soil variables, were not high. The RMSE values were 8.040 for SOC, 7.049 for clay, 10.227 for silt and 13.561 for loam. The layers obtained were then used to obtain annual curve number layers whose ability to reproduce runoff hydrographs was compared with the official CN layer. For high flow events, the CN layers obtained in this study gave better results (NSE=0.807, PBIAS=-4.7 and RMSE=0.4) than the official CN layers (NSE=-2.28, PBIAS=135.82 and RMSE=1.8).es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent24es
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherSpringeres
dc.relationOpen Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. Grant TED2021-131131B-I00 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by the European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTRes
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectSoil variableses
dc.subjectMachine learninges
dc.subjectHyperparameter optimisationes
dc.subjectHydrological modellinges
dc.subject.otherCDU::9 - Geografía e historiaes
dc.titleEstimation of soil properties using machine learning techniques to improve hydrological modeling in a semiarid environment: Campo de Cartagena (Spain)es
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12145-025-01833-wes
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-025-01833-w-
dc.contributor.departmentDepartamento de Geografíaes
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
AlonsoSarria_etal.pdfPublished Version5,87 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons