Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17081368

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorAlonso Sarria, Francisco-
dc.contributor.authorValdivieso Ros, Carmen-
dc.contributor.authorMolina-Pérez, Gabriel-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-11T11:59:01Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-11T11:59:01Z-
dc.date.issued2025-04-11-
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing, 2025, 17, 1368es
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 2072-4292-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/155820-
dc.description© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI,Basel,Switzerland. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This document is the Published version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Remote Sensing. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17081368-
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Floods are a major threat to human life and economic assets. Monitoring these events is therefore essential to quantify and minimize such losses. Remote sensing has been used to extract flooded areas, with SAR imagery being particularly useful as it is independent of weather conditions. This approach is more difficult when detecting flooded areas in semi-arid environments, without a reference permanent water body, than when monitoring the water level rise of permanent rivers or lakes. In this study, Random Forest is used to estimate flooded cells after 19 events in Campo de Cartagena, an agricultural area in SE Spain. Sentinel-1 SAR metrics are used as predictors and irrigation ponds as training areas. To minimize false positives, the pre- and post-event results are compared and only those pixels with a probability of water increase are considered as flooded areas. The ability of the RF model to detect water surfaces is demonstrated (mean accuracy = 0.941, standard deviation = 0.048) along the 19 events. Validating using optical imagery (Sentinel-2 MSI) reduces accuracy to 0.642. This form of validation can only be applied to a single event using a S2 image taken 3 days before the S1 image. A large number of false negatives is then expected. A procedure developed to correct for this error gives an accuracy of 0.886 for this single event. Another form of indirect validation consists in relating the area flooded in each event to the amount of rainfall recorded. An RF regression model using both rainfall metrics and season of the year gives a correlation coefficient of 0.451 and RMSE = 979 ha using LOO-CV. This result shows a clear relationship between flooded areas and rainfall metrics.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent27es
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.relationThis research was funded the Grant TED2021-131131B-I00 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/ 501100011033 and by the European Union NextGenerat onEU/PRTR.es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectSARes
dc.subjectSentinel-1es
dc.subjectSentinel-2es
dc.subjectFlooded areases
dc.subjectMachine learninges
dc.subjectShapleyes
dc.subject.otherCDU::9 - Geografía e historiaes
dc.titleDetecting flooded areas using Sentinel-1 SAR imageryes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/8/1368es
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs17081368-
dc.contributor.departmentGeografíaes
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
AlonsoSarria_etal.pdfPublished Version27,93 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons