Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-017-0727-1

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorCano, J. A.-
dc.contributor.authorCarazo, C.-
dc.contributor.authorSalmerón Martínez, Diego-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-28T10:48:02Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-28T10:48:02Z-
dc.date.issued2018-03-
dc.identifier.citationComputational Statistics, 2018, vol. 33, pp. 235–248es
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 0943-4062-
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1613-9658-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/149448-
dc.description© 2017, Springer-Verlag. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This document is the Accepted version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Computational Statistics. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-017-0727-1es
dc.description.abstractAn objective Bayesian procedure for testing in the two way analysis of variance is proposed. In the classical methodology the main effects of the two factors and the interaction effect are formulated as linear contrasts between means of normal populations, and hypotheses of the existence of such effects are tested. In this paper, for the first time these hypotheses have been formulated as objective Bayesian model selection problems. Our development is under homoscedasticity and heteroscedasticity, providing exact solutions in both cases. Bayes factors are the key tool to choose between the models under comparison but for the usual default prior distributions they are not well defined. To avoid this difficulty Bayes factors for intrinsic priors are proposed and they are applied in this setting to test the existence of the main effects and the interaction effect. The method has been illustrated with an example and compared with the classical method. For this example, both approaches went in the same direction although the large P value for interaction (0.79) only prevents us against to reject the null, and the posterior probability of the null (0.95) was conclusive.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent14es
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherSpringeres
dc.relationThis research was supported by the Séneca Foundation Programme for the Generation of Excellence Scientific Knowledge under Project 15220/PI/10.es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectBayes factorses
dc.subjectIntrinsic priorses
dc.subjectLinear contrastses
dc.titleObjective Bayesian model selection approach to the two way analysis of variancees
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00180-017-0727-1es
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-017-0727-1-
dc.contributor.departmentDepartamento de Ciencias Sociosanitarias-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
CanoCarazoSalmeron_2.pdf288,71 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons