Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2522082064

Título: Urethrography in Men: Conventional Technique versus Clamp Method
Fecha de publicación: 1-jul-2009
Editorial: Radiological Society of North America
Cita bibliográfica: Radiology. 2009 Jul; 252(1): 240–6.
ISSN: Print.: 0033-8419
Electronic.: 1527-1315
Materias relacionadas: CDU::6 - Ciencias aplicadas::61 - Medicina::615 - Farmacología. Terapéutica. Toxicología. Radiología
Palabras clave: Urethra
Radiography
Resumen: To compare examination adequacy and patient discomfort during retrograde urethrography (RUG) performed by using the conventional balloon method versus those of RUG and voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) performed with he clamp method of using drip infusion for the administration of contrast material. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board; written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Eighty men (mean age, 64.3 years; range, 18 – 85 years) suspected of having urethral stenosis were randomly distributed into two groups for urethrography: a control group (n 36) and a clamp group (n 44). In 11 of the 36 patients in the control group, the conventional balloon method could not be used, so these patients were transferred to the clamp group. Drip infusion was used to administer contrast material for RUG, and, except in cases where a suprapubic catheter was used (n 8), for VCUG. The pain levels reported by patients were recorded by using a verbal descriptor scale (VDS) and a visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: In the control group, RUG was successfully performed in 69% of patients (25 of 36), and mean pain levels recorded on inflation of the balloon were distressing according to the VDS and 4.8 (range, 2.3–7.5) according to the VAS. In the clamp group, RUG was successfully performed in all cases; in 69% of patients in this group (38 of 55), the pain level recorded at external compression was no pain according to the VDS and 0 according to the VAS, while mean values in the remaining 31% of patients (17 of 55) were mild pain on the VDS and 0.6 (range, 0.3–1.2) on the VAS. Bladder filling for VCUG was achieved with drip infusion in 96% of patients (69 of 72) in an average time of 11 minutes. Conclusion: The conventional balloon method of performing RUG is painful and, in some cases, not effective. The clamp method is a simple, well-tolerated procedure that allowed diagnostic evaluation in all cases. Drip infusion enables RUG and VCUG to be performed without the need for syringes or bladder catheters, thus increasing patient comfort.
Autor/es principal/es: Berná Mestre, Juan de Dios
Berna Serna, Juan de Dios
Aparicio Mesón, Martín
Canteras Jordana, Manuel
Versión del editor: https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.2522082064
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10201/149062
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2522082064
Tipo de documento: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Número páginas / Extensión: 9
Derechos: info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
Descripción: © RSNA, 2009 This document is the published version of a published work that appeared in final form in Radiology To access the final edited and published work see: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2522082064
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
Urethrography Radiology,2009.pdfMétodo clamp de uretrografia379,79 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir    Solicitar una copia


Los ítems de Digitum están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.