Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.06.048

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorDoval Miñarro, Marta-
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Ferradás, Enrique-
dc.contributor.authorRomero Trigueros, Cristina-
dc.contributor.authorBarberá Rico, Jonathan-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-15T11:40:45Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-15T11:40:45Z-
dc.date.issued2011-09-
dc.identifier.citationAtmospheric Environment, 2011, Vol. 45, Issue 30, pp. 5366-5375es
dc.identifier.issnPrint:-
dc.identifier.issnElectronic:-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/148473-
dc.description©2011. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This document is the accepted version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Atmospheric Environment. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.06.048-
dc.description.abstractUsers of automatic air pollution monitors are largely unaware of how certain parameters, like pressure, can affect readings. The present work examines the influence of inlet pressure changes on chemiluminescence NOx measurements. These changes have been grouped into two categories: (i) those due to changes in atmospheric pressure and (ii) those produced by any other reason (e.g., clogs in the inlet sampling line). Atmospheric pressure changes were simulated varying both the inlet and the outlet sample line pressures in the same way, whereas sample pressure changes were produced modifying only the inlet sample line pressure. Analyzer calibration was performed with zero air and 200 nmol mol−1 of NO at 101.3 kPa. The test pressures ranged from −10 to +10 kPa with respect to the calibration pressure. ANOVA and Dunnett's tests were performed to look for significant differences between measurements obtained under calibration conditions and those obtained under different pressure conditions. The differences in measurements were practically negligible for fixed analyzers subjected to usual changes in atmospheric pressure (<±5 kPa); however, differences could be as high as 7% if ±10 kPa pressure changes took place in the inlet sample line for causes included in the second group.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent10es
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherElsevieres
dc.relationWe would like to acknowledge the Agencia Regional de Ciencia y Tecnología - Fundación Séneca de Murcia for its support in this study (project 05705/PI/07) and for giving a pre- and post-doctoral grant to M. Doval Miñarro (01210/FPI/03 and 12400/PD/09). We would also like to thank the Consejería de Agricultura y Agua of the Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia for its financial support and for the facilities to carry out this work.es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAir monitoringes
dc.subjectPressure changeses
dc.subjectData qualityes
dc.subjectNOx measurementses
dc.titleDo pressure changes have an influence on ambient air chemiluminescence NOx measurements?es
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231011006601?via%3Dihubes
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.06.048-
dc.contributor.departmentDepartamento de Ingeniería Química-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos



Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons