Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.05.009

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorRobles-Palazón, Francisco Javier-
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Pérez, Iñaki-
dc.contributor.authorOliver, Jon L.-
dc.contributor.authorAyala, Francisco-
dc.contributor.authorSainz de Baranda, Pilar-
dc.contributor.otherFacultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Actividad Física y Deportees
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-09T09:45:34Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-09T09:45:34Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationPhysical Therapy in Sport 50 (2021) 206-216es
dc.identifier.issn1466-853X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/139073-
dc.description©2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by /4.0/ This document is the, Published, version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Physical Therapy in Sport. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.05.009es
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To determine the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of frontal and sagittal plane landing kinematic measures during drop jump (DVJ) and tuck jump (TJA) tasks in male youth soccer players, to assess the concurrent validity between DVJ and TJA tests, and to evaluate the ability of both tasks to detect differences between players’ stage of maturation. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: 223 male youth soccer players. Main outcome measures: Frontal plane knee projection angles (FPPA), and hip (HF), knee (KF) and ankle (AF) flexion angles at initial contact (IC) and peak flexion (PF) (i.e., the deepest landing position) in the sagittal plane were assessed. Results: Good-to-excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability (ICC > 0.75; TEMST < 0.3; CVTE < 5%) for the FPPA, HF and KF during DVJ and TJA tasks were found. A low concurrent validity between DVJ and TJA measures was reported. Differences by maturity status (BF10 > 10; error < 10; d > 0.6) were only identified for the TJA. Pre-PHV group reported higher FPPA, HF-IC, HF-PF, and KF-IC values, as well as lower AF-IC than post-PHV. Pre-PHV also displayed greater HF-IC and KF-IC than circa-PHV group. Conclusions: Although both tests are reliable, the TJA might be viewed as a more informative tool given it shows greater FPPA and can also detect differences by maturity status.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent11es
dc.languageenges
dc.relationPart of this work was carried out during a research stay at Cardiff Metropolitan University from March to July 2020. Francisco Javier Robles-Palazón was supported by the Program of Human Resources Formation for Science and Technology (20326/FPI/2017) from the Seneca Foundation-Agency for Science and Technology in the Region of Murcia (Spain). Francisco Ayala was supported by a Ramón y Cajal postdoctoral fellowship given by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (RYC2019-028383-I). This study is part of the project entitled “Estudio del riesgo de lesión en jóvenes deportistas a través de redes de inteligencia artificial”, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (DEP2017-88775-P), the State Research Agency (AEI) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleReliability, validity, and maturation-related differences of frontal and sagittal plane landing kinematic measures during drop jump and tuck jump screening tests in male youth soccer playerses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.05.009-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos: Actividad Física y del Deporte

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
Robles-Palazón et al. (2021).pdfArtículo1,39 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons