Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
doi.org/10.3390/jcm10010101
Twittear
Título: | Vertical ridge augmentation of fibula flap in mandibular reconstruction: a comparison between vertical distraction, double-barrel flap, and iliac crest graft |
Fecha de publicación: | 30-dic-2020 |
Editorial: | MDPI |
Cita bibliográfica: | Journal of Clinical Medicine . 2021, 10, 101. |
ISSN: | Electronic: 2077-0383 |
Materias relacionadas: | CDU::5 - Ciencias puras y naturales |
Palabras clave: | Fibula flap Vertical augmentation Double-barrel flap Vertical distraction Iliac crest graft |
Resumen: | Double-barrel flap, vertical distraction and iliac crest graft are used to reconstruct the vertical height of the fibula. Twenty-four patients with fibula flap were reconstructed comparing these techniques (eight patients in each group) in terms of height of bone, bone resorption, implant success rate and the effects of radiotherapy. The increase in vertical bone with vertical distraction, double-barrel flap and iliac crest was 12.5 ± 0.78 mm, 18.5 ± 0.5 mm, and 17.75 ± 0.6 mm, (p < 0.001). The perimplant bone resorption was 2.31 ± 0.12 mm, 1.23 ± 0.09 mm and 1.43 ± 0.042 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. There were significant differences in vertical bone reconstruction and bone resorption between double-barrel flap and vertical distraction and between iliac crest and vertical distraction (p < 0.001). The study did not show significant differences in implant failure (p = 0.346). Radiotherapy did not affect vertical bone reconstruction (p = 0.125) or bone resorption (p = 0.237) but it showed higher implant failure in radiated patients (p = 0.015). The double-barrel flap and iliac crest graft showed better stability in the height of bone and less bone resorption and higher implant success rates compared with vertical distraction. Radiation therapy did not affect the vertical bone reconstruction but resulted in a higher implant failure. |
Autor/es principal/es: | Navarro Cuéllar, Carlos Ochandiano Caicoya, Santiago Navarro Cuéllar, Ignacio Valladares Pérez, Salvador Fariña Sirandon, Rodrigo Antúnez-Conde, Raúl Díez Montiel, Alberto Sánchez Pérez, Arturo López López, Ana María Navarro Vila, Carlos Salmerón Escobar, José Ignacio |
Facultad/Departamentos/Servicios: | Facultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física |
Versión del editor: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/1/101 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10201/137682 |
DOI: | doi.org/10.3390/jcm10010101 |
Tipo de documento: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Número páginas / Extensión: | 16 |
Derechos: | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Atribución 4.0 Internacional |
Descripción: | © 2020. The authors. This document is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by /4.0/ This document is the published version of a published work that appeared in final form in Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Matería temporal: | 2015-2019 |
Matería geográfica: | Madrid |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Artículos: Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
jcm-10-00101.pdf | 4,01 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons