Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: doi.org/10.3390/jcm10010101

Título: Vertical ridge augmentation of fibula flap in mandibular reconstruction: a comparison between vertical distraction, double-barrel flap, and iliac crest graft
Fecha de publicación: 30-dic-2020
Editorial: MDPI
Cita bibliográfica: Journal of Clinical Medicine . 2021, 10, 101.
ISSN: Electronic: 2077-0383
Materias relacionadas: CDU::5 - Ciencias puras y naturales
Palabras clave: Fibula flap
Vertical augmentation
Double-barrel flap
Vertical distraction
Iliac crest graft
Resumen: Double-barrel flap, vertical distraction and iliac crest graft are used to reconstruct the vertical height of the fibula. Twenty-four patients with fibula flap were reconstructed comparing these techniques (eight patients in each group) in terms of height of bone, bone resorption, implant success rate and the effects of radiotherapy. The increase in vertical bone with vertical distraction, double-barrel flap and iliac crest was 12.5 ± 0.78 mm, 18.5 ± 0.5 mm, and 17.75 ± 0.6 mm, (p < 0.001). The perimplant bone resorption was 2.31 ± 0.12 mm, 1.23 ± 0.09 mm and 1.43 ± 0.042 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. There were significant differences in vertical bone reconstruction and bone resorption between double-barrel flap and vertical distraction and between iliac crest and vertical distraction (p < 0.001). The study did not show significant differences in implant failure (p = 0.346). Radiotherapy did not affect vertical bone reconstruction (p = 0.125) or bone resorption (p = 0.237) but it showed higher implant failure in radiated patients (p = 0.015). The double-barrel flap and iliac crest graft showed better stability in the height of bone and less bone resorption and higher implant success rates compared with vertical distraction. Radiation therapy did not affect the vertical bone reconstruction but resulted in a higher implant failure.
Autor/es principal/es: Navarro Cuéllar, Carlos
Ochandiano Caicoya, Santiago
Navarro Cuéllar, Ignacio
Valladares Pérez, Salvador
Fariña Sirandon, Rodrigo
Antúnez-Conde, Raúl
Díez Montiel, Alberto
Sánchez Pérez, Arturo
López López, Ana María
Navarro Vila, Carlos
Salmerón Escobar, José Ignacio
Facultad/Departamentos/Servicios: Facultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física
Versión del editor: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/1/101
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10201/137682
DOI: doi.org/10.3390/jcm10010101
Tipo de documento: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Número páginas / Extensión: 16
Derechos: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Descripción: © 2020. The authors. This document is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by /4.0/ This document is the published version of a published work that appeared in final form in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Matería temporal: 2015-2019
Matería geográfica: Madrid
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos: Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
jcm-10-00101.pdf4,01 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons