Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: doi.org/10.3390/jcm10010101

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorNavarro Cuéllar, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorOchandiano Caicoya, Santiago-
dc.contributor.authorNavarro Cuéllar, Ignacio-
dc.contributor.authorValladares Pérez, Salvador-
dc.contributor.authorFariña Sirandon, Rodrigo-
dc.contributor.authorAntúnez-Conde, Raúl-
dc.contributor.authorDíez Montiel, Alberto-
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Pérez, Arturo-
dc.contributor.authorLópez López, Ana María-
dc.contributor.authorNavarro Vila, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorSalmerón Escobar, José Ignacio-
dc.coverage.spatialMadrides
dc.coverage.temporal2015-2019es
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-24T13:20:01Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-24T13:20:01Z-
dc.date.issued2020-12-30-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Medicine . 2021, 10, 101.es
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 2077-0383-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/137682-
dc.description© 2020. The authors. This document is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by /4.0/ This document is the published version of a published work that appeared in final form in Journal of Clinical Medicinees
dc.description.abstractDouble-barrel flap, vertical distraction and iliac crest graft are used to reconstruct the vertical height of the fibula. Twenty-four patients with fibula flap were reconstructed comparing these techniques (eight patients in each group) in terms of height of bone, bone resorption, implant success rate and the effects of radiotherapy. The increase in vertical bone with vertical distraction, double-barrel flap and iliac crest was 12.5 ± 0.78 mm, 18.5 ± 0.5 mm, and 17.75 ± 0.6 mm, (p < 0.001). The perimplant bone resorption was 2.31 ± 0.12 mm, 1.23 ± 0.09 mm and 1.43 ± 0.042 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. There were significant differences in vertical bone reconstruction and bone resorption between double-barrel flap and vertical distraction and between iliac crest and vertical distraction (p < 0.001). The study did not show significant differences in implant failure (p = 0.346). Radiotherapy did not affect vertical bone reconstruction (p = 0.125) or bone resorption (p = 0.237) but it showed higher implant failure in radiated patients (p = 0.015). The double-barrel flap and iliac crest graft showed better stability in the height of bone and less bone resorption and higher implant success rates compared with vertical distraction. Radiation therapy did not affect the vertical bone reconstruction but resulted in a higher implant failure.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent16es
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidades
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectFibula flapes
dc.subjectVertical augmentationes
dc.subjectDouble-barrel flapes
dc.subjectVertical distractiones
dc.subjectIliac crest graftes
dc.subject.otherCDU::5 - Ciencias puras y naturaleses
dc.titleVertical ridge augmentation of fibula flap in mandibular reconstruction: a comparison between vertical distraction, double-barrel flap, and iliac crest graftes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/1/101es
dc.identifier.doidoi.org/10.3390/jcm10010101-
dc.contributor.departmentDermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
jcm-10-00101.pdf4,01 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons