Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: 10.17645/mac.v8i2.2721

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorPérez Díaz, Pedro Luis-
dc.contributor.authorZamora Medina, Rocío-
dc.contributor.authorArroyas Langa, Enrique-
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-17T08:42:06Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-17T08:42:06Z-
dc.date.created2019-12-15-
dc.date.issued2020-04-17-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/89905-
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, the accountability practices of digital journalism have gone from constituting an intimate and self-regulatory system of journalistic culture to a complex process that is increasingly external and open to the public (Fengler, Eberwein, Mazzoleni, Porlezza, & Russ-Mohl, 2014; Suárez-Villegas, Rodríguez-Martínez, Mauri-Ríos, & López-Meri, 2017). In this context, values and goals may remain diverse, arguably linked to idiosyncratic elements which often open a gap between traditional and more contemporary newsroom models. Following a qualitative approach, this study examines online media accountability instruments from a functional perspective, dividing its influence in three temporal phases of news produc- tion (Heikkilä et al., 2012). In this way, instruments that hold journalists responsible for their work are explored in four leading online news media from Spain: two digital native outlets (Eldiario.es and ElConfidencial.com) and two legacy out- lets (ElPais.com and ElMundo.es). In addition to this observation, in-depth interviews are conducted with staff members in charge of audience management to explore the inner routines and protocols that determine the efficacy of such aspi- rations. Our work reveals the preponderant role of instruments focused on the actor and production transparency that the studied media implement to fulfill their responsibility, especially when compared with the weakened self-regulation instruments. The answers of the interviewees stress the difficulties they face in managing participatory forms of account- ability and disclose tensions between different strategies, as well as other structural factors that are discussed as essential for the consolidation of these deontological initiatives.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent12es
dc.languageenges
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectcitizen participationes
dc.subjectdeontologyes
dc.subjectdigital journalismes
dc.subjectjournalism ethicses
dc.subjectjournalistic culturees
dc.subjectmedia accountabilityes
dc.subjectself-regulationes
dc.subjecttransparencyes
dc.subject.otherCDU::0 - Generalidades.::070 - Periódicos. Prensa. Periodismo. Ciencias de la informaciónes
dc.titleBetween Self-Regulation and Participatory Monitoring: Comparing Digital News Media Accountability Practices in Spaines
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doi10.17645/mac.v8i2.2721-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos: Información y Documentación



Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons