Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103907

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorRomán Nicolás, Sergio-
dc.contributor.authorPascual del Riquelme Martínez, María Isabel-
dc.contributor.authorIacobucci, Dawn-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-28T18:34:53Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-28T18:34:53Z-
dc.date.issued2024-09-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2024, Vol. 80 : 103907-
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 0969-6989-
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1873-1384-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/149525-
dc.description© 2024 The Authors. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This document is the Published Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103907-
dc.description.abstractConsumers often engage in exaggeration when sharing their experiences online. This study focuses on how consumers interpret extremely positive and exaggerated product reviews. Results derived from a survey with 601 consumers evaluating cell phone reviews indicate that internal and external attributions fully mediate the influence of the reader’s shopping related characteristics (online shopping expertise and product involvement) and personality traits (close-mindedness, Machiavellianism, cynicism) on perceptions of the review’s helpfulness. Helpfulness, in turn, enhances consumers’ behavioral and recommendation intentions. The impact of perceived helpfulness on purchase intentions is stronger for brands seen as low-quality compared to those regarded as highquality. Several theoretical and practical implications are discussed.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent11es
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relationÁmbito del proyecto: nacional / Agencia financiadora: Agencia Estatal de Investigación / Convocatoria: «Proyectos I+D+i» 2020 / Nombre proyecto: Online communication of sustainability: Towards more sustainable decisions as consumers and citizens (ONCOMSUST) / Código de subvención: PID2020-116247GB-I00es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectExtremely positive and exaggerated online reviewses
dc.subjectPerceived helpfulnesses
dc.subjectConsumer reactionses
dc.titleAntecedents and consequences of perceived helpfulness of extremely positive and exaggerated reviewses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924002030-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103907-
dc.contributor.departmentDepartamento de Comercialización e Investigación de Mercados-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
JRCS 2024 - Extreme reviews.pdf1,93 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons