Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151829

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorGuerrero Gironés, Julia-
dc.contributor.authorLópez García, Sergio-
dc.contributor.authorPecci Lloret, Miguel Ramón-
dc.contributor.authorPecci Lloret, María Pilar-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Bernal, David-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T12:44:45Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-27T12:44:45Z-
dc.date.issued2021-09-06-
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Anatomy, 239 (2021)151829-
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 0940-9602 |-
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1618-0402-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/149350-
dc.description©2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This document is the Published, version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Annals of Anatomy. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151829-
dc.description.abstractAims: To analyze the biological effects of the cements Relyx Unicem 2, Panavia V5, Multilink Hybrid Abutment and SoloCem on human gingival fibroblast cells (HGFs). Materials and methods: HGFs were exposed to different eluates (n = 40) of the studied resin-based cements. Their cytotoxic effects and influence on cell migration were assessed using MTT and wound-healing assays, respectively. Level of HGF attachment, cell morphology and F-actin cytoskeleton content after exposition to the different eluates were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal microscopy analysis, respectively. The levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by the eluates of the different cements were also determined by flow cytometry. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey´s test. Results: Eluates of SoloCem significantly reduces the viability of HGFs (69% reduction compared to control at 48 h). Cell migration of HGFs in presence of undiluted SoloCem eluates was significantly lower than in the control (88% open wound area at 24 h). Contrarily, migration speed with Multilynk eluates was similar to that of the control group at all periods of time and all dilutions studied. SEM analysis showed very few cells in SoloCem group, and a moderate cell growth in Multilink, Panavia and Relyx groups were detected. Finally, ROS levels detected in HGFs treated with the more concentrated SoloCem and Relyx dilutions were significantly enhanced compared with that in the control cells or the other groups (44% and 11% ROS positive cells, respectively). Conclusions: The results obtained in the present work suggest that Multilink hybrid abutment has better biological properties and lower cytotoxicity for cementing implant crowns on abutments.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent9es
dc.languagespaes
dc.publisherElsevieres
dc.relationThis work was supported by the Spanish Network of Cell Therapy (TerCel), RETICS subprograms of the I+D+I 2013–2016 Spanish National Plan, project “RD16/0011/0001” funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III and co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund.es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectImplant abutmentes
dc.subjectCytotoxicity-
dc.subjectPeri-implantitis-
dc.subjectHuman gingival fibroblasts-
dc.subjectResin-based cements-
dc.titleInfluence of dual-cure and self-cure abutment cements for crown implants on human gingival fibroblasts biological propertieses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0940960221001552?via%3Dihub-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151829-
dc.contributor.departmentDepartamento de Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
16. Influence of dual-cure and self-cure abutment cements for crown.pdfArtículo científico892,4 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons