Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2018.1405330

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorHogg, Katie-
dc.contributor.authorSemitiel-García, María-
dc.contributor.authorNoguera-Méndez, Pedro-
dc.contributor.authorGray, Tim-
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Sarah-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-14T08:45:49Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-14T08:45:49Z-
dc.date.issued2017-12-29-
dc.identifier.citationCoastal Management, 2018, Vol. 46 (1), pp. 58–74es
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 0892-0753-
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1521-0421-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/148358-
dc.description© 2018 Taylor and Francis. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This document is the Accepted version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Coastal Management. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2018.1405330es
dc.description.abstractMany marine protected areas (MPAs) face a multitude of threats to the ecosystems that they have been established to conserve. This study is based on 111 interviews conducted in 2013–2014 designed to discover the perceptions of stakeholders about the threats, the causes of the threats, and their responses to the threats, to a well-established MPA – Cabo de Palos - Islas Hormigas (CPH-MPA). This MPA was created to safeguard fisheries and the associated artisanal fishers, but over time it has become a tourism “hotspot.” Resilience theory, which incorporates ecological resilience, social resilience, and individual resilience, helps us to analyze stakeholders' responses to threats by categorizing them into passive, adaptive, and transformative responses. We found respondents identified four main threats – over-fishing, excessive scuba diving, pollution, and invasive species; attributed the threats to three main causes – ineffective management, poor environmental stewardship, and climate change; and expressed three kinds of responses – do nothing, adapt, or transform – with a preference for adaptation and (especially) transformation. The lesson of this study is that it shows how, unless drastic action is taken to curb recreational diving activities, the CPH-MPA is in danger of changing from a fishing reserve to a largely unregulated leisure diving venue, which is unlikely to fulfill the requirements of resilience; ecological, social, or individual.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent26es
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Groupes
dc.relationThe researchers acknowledge with gratitude that this study received funding from the FP7 – People - Marie Curie Actions – Initial Training Network for Monitoring Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas (ITN-MMMPA) project, Contract No. 290056.es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectAdaptationes
dc.subjectMarine protected areases
dc.subjectPerceptionses
dc.subjectResiliencees
dc.subjectSolutionses
dc.subjectThreatses
dc.subjectTransformationes
dc.titlePerceptions of threats facing Cabo de Palos - Islas Hormigas MPA and potential solutionses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08920753.2018.1405330es
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2018.1405330-
dc.contributor.departmentDepartamento de Economía Aplicada-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
CoastalManagement2018.pdf935,69 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons