Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0766-y

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorValderrama Zurián, Juan Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorCastelló-Cogollos, Lourdes-
dc.contributor.authorAleixandre Benavent, Rafael-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-09T17:51:06Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-09T17:51:06Z-
dc.date.issued2019-08-28-
dc.identifier.citationInsights into Imaging, 2019, Vol. 10 : 79es
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1869-4101-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/148184-
dc.description© The Author(s). 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This document is the Published Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Insights into Imaging. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0766-y-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To analyse the coverage and main bibliometric indicators of Insights into Imaging in Scopus and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) from the Web of Science Core Collection database. Methods: The evolution of journal production in the Scopus database was analysed according to document types, collaboration indexes between authors and institutions, and citation indicators (number of citations, SCImago Journal Rank, quartile, h-index, and most cited works). Networks of collaboration among authors, institutions, and countries were also analysed, as well as those of co-word networks. As a complementary source of information, the Emerging Source Citation Index from the Web of Science database was also considered. Results: Four hundred seventy-four papers were included in Scopus and 292 in ESCI. The index of collaboration was 5.18 for authors and 2.74 for institutions. International collaboration occurred in 24.7% of the papers. The number of citations received in Scopus (4295) exceeds the number of citations received in ESCI (1177). The average number of citations per paper was 9.06 in Scopus versus 4.03 in ESCI. The h-index was 29 in Scopus and 16 in ESCI. Several collaborative groups were identified at the national and international level. Conclusions: There is a progression of Insights into Imaging in the ranking of journals in the area that, if maintained, will allow it to remain in the first quartile in the Scopus database. The main topics of interest were technologies such as ‘Magnetic resonance imaging’, ‘Computed tomography’, ‘Radiology’, and ‘Ultrasonography’ and diseases such as ‘Breast cancer’ and those related to ‘Paediatrics’.-
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent13es
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherSpringerOpenes
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidades
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectPublicationses
dc.subjectBibliometricses
dc.subjectDatabaseses
dc.subjectBibliographices
dc.subjectJournal impact factores
dc.subjectDiagnostic imaginges
dc.titleTrends in scientific research in Insights into Imaging: a bibliometric reviewes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://insightsimaging.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13244-019-0766-y-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0766-y-
dc.contributor.departmentDepartamento de Información y Documentación-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
Trends in scientific research in Insights.pdfTrends in scientific research in Insights3,3 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons