Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01155.x

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorLópez Jornet, Pia-
dc.contributor.authorCamacho Alonso, Fabio-
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Escribano, Myriam-
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Beneyto, Yolanda-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-27T11:13:25Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-27T11:13:25Z-
dc.date.issued2010-01-21-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16(3):539-41es
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 1356-1294-
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1365-2753-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/147807-
dc.description© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation, 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. This document is the Published version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01155.x-
dc.description.abstractAim To determine the attitude of Spanish general dentists in relation to dental extraction in patients with heart valve prostheses subjected to acenocoumarol anticoagulation. Material and methods A telephone survey was made of Spanish general dentists, asking about the indicated approach in the case of performing dental extractions in patients with heart valve prostheses subjected to acenocoumarol (Sintrom®) anticoagulation. Results Of the 271 dentists answered, 175 were male (64.6%) and 96 were female (35.4%), with a mean professional experience of 20.17 ± 9.3 years. A total of 228 dentists (84.1%) indicated the need to refer the patient to a specialist for establishing the required approach, while 43 dentists (15.9%) did not consider such a measure to be necessary. Among this latter group of 43 dentists, 26 (60.5%) considered that acenocoumarol should be withdrawn or replaced by low-molecular weight heparin, while 17 (39.5%) were of the opinion that the anticoagulation regimen should not be modified. In relation to the international normalized ratio, 36 (83.7%) did not consider it necessary to request this parameter. As regards the prevention of endocarditis, 11 (25.6%) specified the need for prophylaxis, although only eight (72.7%) did so correctly. There were no statistically significant differences in behaviour in relation to either gender or years of professional experience. Conclusions This study identifies a lack of knowledge on the part of the dentists regarding the approach to dental extraction in patients with heart valve prostheses subjected to anticoagulation. Due educational measures therefore should be reinforced among these professionals.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent3es
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidades
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses
dc.subjectAnticoagulationes
dc.subjectDentists-
dc.subjectEndocarditis-
dc.subjectProphylaxis-
dc.subjectTooth extraction-
dc.titleBehavior and attitudes among Spanish general dentists towards the anticoagulated patient: a pilot studyes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01155.x-
dc.embargo.termsSi-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01155.x-
dc.contributor.departmentDepartamento de Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos



Los ítems de Digitum están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.