Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1095


Título: | Towards a better QALY model |
Fecha de publicación: | 3-jul-2006 |
Editorial: | Wiley |
Cita bibliográfica: | Health Economics, 2006, Vol. 15, N. 7, pp. 665-676 |
ISSN: | Print: 1057-9230 Electronic: 1099-1050 |
Palabras clave: | Cost utility analysis QALYs Power QALY model Predictive validity Time tradeof |
Resumen: | This paper presents a test of the predictive validity of various classes of QALY models (i.e. linear, power and exponential models). We first estimated TTO utilities for 43 EQ-5D chronic health states and next these states were embedded in nonchronic health profiles. The chronic TTO utilities were then used to predict the responses to TTO questions with nonchronic health profiles. We find that the power QALY model clearly outperforms linear and exponential QALY models. Optimal power coefficient is 0.65. Our results suggest that TTO-based QALY calculations may be biased. This bias can be corrected using a power QALY model. |
Autor/es principal/es: | Abellán Perpiñán, José María Pinto Prades, José Luis Méndez Martínez, Ildefonso Badía Llach, Xabier |
Versión del editor: | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.1095 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10201/146986 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1095 |
Tipo de documento: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Número páginas / Extensión: | 12 |
Derechos: | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
Descripción: | © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This document is the Published version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Health Economics. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1095 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
TowardsabetterQALYmodel.pdf | 297,52 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() Visualizar/Abrir Solicitar una copia |
Los ítems de Digitum están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.