Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12435

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorCamacho Alonso, Fabio-
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Beneyto, Yolanda-
dc.contributor.authorGallego, Mª Carmen-
dc.contributor.authorCuello, Francisco-
dc.contributor.authorBuendía, Antonio Julián-
dc.contributor.authorPérez Lajarín, Leonor-
dc.contributor.authorSalinas, Jesús-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-15T07:16:14Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-15T07:16:14Z-
dc.date.issued2016-09-03-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Oral Pathology & Medicine, 2016, Vol. 45, Issue 8, pp. 627-633es
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 0904-2512-
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 600-0714-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/146362-
dc.description© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. This document is the Submitted, Accepted, Published, version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12435es
dc.description.abstractBackground The wide use of topical and systemic antifungal agents as the conventional treatment for oral candidiasis has caused Candida albicans to develop resistance to these agents. The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and chitosan on buccal candidiasis and study the possible enhancive effect of chitosan on the photosensitizer methylene blue. Methods Thirty-five DBA/2 immunosuppressed mice were orally inoculated with a suspension of Candida albicans. The animals were randomized into seven groups (n = 5 per group): Group 1 (control); Group 2 (nystatin); Group 3 (PDT); Group 4 (chitosan 1.5 mg/ml); Group 5 (chitosan 3 mg/ml); Group 6 (PDT + chitosan 1.5 mg/ml); and Group 7 (PDT + chitosan 3 mg/ml). The Candida albicans count was evaluated on days 3, 5, 7, and 11 after inoculation. At last, macroscopic and microscopic analyses of the tongue dorsa were performed. Results On day 7 after inoculation, the control group showed a greater number of Candida albicans (5.25 ± 0.41 log10 CFU/ml), with significant differences compared to all other groups (P ≤ 0.05). On day 11 after inoculation, animals treated with PDT showed lower CFU/ml count. Groups 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 showed fewer microscopic candidiasis lesions than Groups 1 and 7. Conclusions PDT has an antifungal effect, even greater than nystatin. Chitosan has a powerful fungicide effect but did not possess any enhancive effect on methylene blue.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent7es
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherWileyes
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidades
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses
dc.subjectCandida albicanses
dc.subjectChitosanes
dc.subjectMurine modeles
dc.subjectOral candidiasises
dc.subjectPhotdynamic therapyes
dc.titleUse of photodynamic therapy and chitosan for inactivacion of Candida albicans in a murine modeles
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jop.12435es
dc.embargo.termsSI-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12435-
dc.contributor.departmentDepartamento de Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos



Los ítems de Digitum están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.