Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-11087-7

Título: Cytoreductive surgery with or without HIPEC After neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: a phase 3 clinical trial
Fecha de publicación: 23-nov-2021
Editorial: Springer
Cita bibliográfica: Ann Surg Oncol (2022) 29:2617–2625
ISSN: Print: 1068-9265
Electronic: 1534-4681
Resumen: Background. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and administration of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have shown their efficacy in multiple malignancies and also could offer a prognostic benefit for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Methods. A prospective, single-center, parallel-group, randomized phase 3 clinical trial analyzed patients with a diagnosis of carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NACT). In this trial, 71 patients were randomized to receive CRS alone (36 patients) or CRS with HIPEC (35 patients) using cisplatin (75 mg/m2 for 60 min at 42 °C). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Overall survival (OS), morbidity, and quality of life (QoL) were the secondary end points. Results. During a median follow-up period of 32 months, the median DFS was 12 months in the control group (CRS) and 18 months in the experimental group (CRS and HIPEC). The findings showed HIPEC to be an independent protective factor against the development of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.12, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.02–0.89; p = 0.038). The median OS was 45 months in the control group and 52 months in the experimental group. The respective morbidity rates for any grade (1 to 5) were respectively 58.3 % and 45.7 % (p > 0.05), with a mortality rates of 2.8 % and 2.9 % (p > 0.05). In the dimensions evaluated, CRS with or without HIPEC had no impact on QoL. Conclusions. For patients who had advanced ovarian cancer treated with NACT, CRS and HIPEC was associated with better DFS and OS, but without a difference in postoperative morbidity, mortality, or in the QoL evaluation.
Autor/es principal/es: Cascales Campos, Pedro Antonio
González Gil, Alida
Gil Gómez, Elena
González Sánchez, Rocío
Martínez García, Jerónimo
Alonso-Romero, José Luis
Nieto Díaz, Aníbal
Barceló Valcárcel, Francisco
Gómez Ruiz, Álvaro Jesús
Ramírez Romero, Pablo
Gil Martínez, José
Versión del editor: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-021-11087-7
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10201/146020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-11087-7
Tipo de documento: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Número páginas / Extensión: 9
Derechos: info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
Descripción: © Society of Surgical Oncology 2021. This document is the Published version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Annals of Surgical Oncology. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-11087-7
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
s10434-021-11087-7.pdf282,6 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir    Solicitar una copia


Los ítems de Digitum están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.