Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31821c790a

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Pérez, Arturo-
dc.contributor.authorMoya Villaescusa, María José-
dc.contributor.authorCaffesse, Raúl Guillermo-
dc.contributor.otherFacultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-04T08:10:15Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-04T08:10:15Z-
dc.date.issued2011-08-
dc.identifier.citationImplant Dentistry, 2011, Vol. 20 (4), pp. 292-298es
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 1056-6163-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/143555-
dc.description© 2011 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. This document is the Published, version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Implant Dentistry. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31821c790a-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate periimplant tissue temperature in a successful implant. It has been shown that periimplant disease and mucositis are inflammatory diseases. As such, one of the main clinical signs is the change in temperature. We try to establish normal values of temperature with an easy to use appliance. Design: Fifty-one individuals were enrolled in this study. Only 1 implant per patient was included. The implants were clinically and radiographically examined and diagnosed as clinical successful implants. An infrared ear thermometer was used to measure periimplant temperature (PIT) and the difference with the sublingual temperature (ΔT). These data were analyzed using the Student t test, analysis of variance, and cluster analysis. Results: Statistically significant differences in PIT were observed between the second sextant and the fourth and fifth sextants. These differences were not significant on considering ΔT. In addition, for the clinically and radiographically successful implants, ΔT for all sextants showed a mean of 0.81 (CI, 0.57–1.04). Conclusions: We have found a difference in outcome between periimplant temperature and the temperature differential. PIT depends on the anatomical location, though ΔT is an independent measurement with a value of 0.81°C.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent7es
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins-
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidad.es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses
dc.subjectMonitoringes
dc.subjectPhysiological methodses
dc.subjectAdverse effectses
dc.subjectOsseointegrationes
dc.titleTemperature of periimplant tissues in clinically successful implants: an observational clinical study in humanses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://journals.lww.com/implantdent/fulltext/2011/08000/temperature_of_periimplant_tissues_in_clinically.8.aspx-
dc.embargo.termsSI-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31821c790a-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos: Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
temperature_of_periimplant_tissues_in_clinically.8.pdf1,06 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir    Solicitar una copia


Los ítems de Digitum están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.