Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01831.x

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMoya Villaescusa, María José-
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Pérez, A.-
dc.contributor.otherFacultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-04T08:15:05Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-04T08:15:05Z-
dc.date.issued2010-01-11-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, Vol. 21, Issue 2, pp. 237–242.es
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 0905-7161-
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1600-0501-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/143534-
dc.description© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. This document is the Published version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Clinical Oral Implants Research. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01831.x-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was a radiographic mesiodistal analysis of the shape of the bone crest 3 months after tooth removal. Material and methods: One hundred single tooth extractions were performed on 100 patients because of orthodontic or prosthetic causes. Bite blocks were used for two radiographs: one on the day of extraction and the other after healing of the socket, 3 months later. These X-rays were used to determine: (1) the most apical distance of alveolar ridge resorption, with baseline as the line between bone-to-teeth contact (the greatest distance in bone resorption height) and (2) the mesiodistal distance (MDD) and mesial and distal angles arising after bone tissue modeling. Results: Significant differences (P<0.05) emerged between the MDDs of multiple- [8 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.09, 9.90] and single-root teeth (5.60 mm, 95% CI: 4.80, 6.50). However, mesial or distal angles or the most apical distance of alveolar ridge resorption did not differ (mean distance in height=4.32 mm, 95% CI: 3.85, 4.78; mean angle=24°). Conclusions: In this study, the post-extraction mesiodistal bone distance between teeth adjacent to the edentulous ridge depends on the size of the edentulous space. Nevertheless, the distance does not affect the distance in bone loss height. The distance of bone resorption height reaches a balance at the midpoint, which we consider indicative of stable healing. This resorption process must be considered when placing dental implants in fresh extraction sockets, especially in aesthetic sites, because the implant surfaces could be exposed after 3 months.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent6es
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidad.es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses
dc.subjectBone healinges
dc.subjectBone modelinges
dc.subjectExtraction socketses
dc.subjectSocket healinges
dc.subjectToothextractiones
dc.subjectWound healinges
dc.titleMeasurement of ridge alterations following tooth removal: a radiographic study in humanses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01831.x-
dc.embargo.termsSI-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01831.x-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos: Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física



Los ítems de Digitum están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.