Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145755

Título: Concentrations of bisphenol-A in adults from the general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fecha de publicación: 25-jun-2021
Editorial: Elsevier
Cita bibliográfica: Science of The Total Environment, 2021, Vol. 775: 145755
ISSN: Print: 0048-9697
Electronic: 1879-1026
Resumen: Background: Human bisphenol-A (BPA) exposure has been linked to adverse health effects even at low doses, which may be of potential public health concern. Objective: To summarize BPA concentrations in general human population and their variability according to sex, geographic area, and analytical method. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting BPA concentrations in adult human populations. Separate meta-analyses of median values were carried out for BPA in serum, creatinine-adjusted urinary BPA, and unadjusted urinary BPA concentrations using a random-effects model. Cochran's Q-statistic, I2 index, 95% prediction intervals (PIs), between-studies standard deviation (τ), and forest plots were applied to verify study heterogeneity. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses and weighted ANOVAs and meta-regressions were conducted. Funnel plots and Egger's tests were used to examine publication bias. Results: Fifteen studieswere included in themeta-analysis, totaling 28,353 participants. BPAwas detected in over 90% of participants. The pooled creatinine-adjusted urinary BPA concentrationwas 1.76 μg/g (95% PI: 0.79–2.73), with individual estimates ranging between 1.20 and 2.41. The pooled estimate for unadjusted urinary BPA was 1.91 μg/l (95% PI: 0–3.97), ranging between 0.81 and 3.50, while the pooled estimate for serum BPA was 1.75 μg/l (95% PI: 0–10.58), ranging between 0.34 and 3.76. No differences were found by sex, geographic area or analytical technique. Larger sample sizeswere associatedwith lower BPA concentrations. Therewas large heterogeneity across studies, whereas data for urinary BPA levels suggested a publication bias affecting research in low exposed populations. Conclusion: This first meta-analysis of human BPA concentrations highlights a widespread population exposure to BPA. Although there was high heterogeneity across studies, the expected range of estimated human BPA concentrations suggests that potential health risks are unlikely. Further studies are warranted to better characterize the epidemiology of human BPA exposure, accounting for ethnic, geographic, individual and environmental variability.
Autor/es principal/es: Colorado Yohar, Sandra M.
Castillo González, Ana C.
Sánchez Meca, Julio
Rubio Aparicio, María
Sánchez Rodríguez, Diego
Salamanca Fernández, Elena
Ardanaz, Eva
Amiano, Pilar
Fernández, Mariana M.
Mendiola Olivares, Jaime
Navarro Mateu, Fernando
Chirlaque, María Dolores
Facultad/Departamentos/Servicios: Facultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamnetos de la UMU::Ciencias Sociosanitarias
Versión del editor: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969721008226
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10201/143012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145755
Tipo de documento: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
Descripción: © 2021 Elsevier Inc. This document is the Published version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Science of the Total Environment. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145755
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos: Ciencias Sociosanitarias

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
A1_SR-MA_BPA_STOTEN.pdf1,81 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir    Solicitar una copia


Los ítems de Digitum están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.