Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2013.797599

Título: When is coagulase-negative Staphylococcus bacteraemia clinically significant?
Fecha de publicación: 1-jul-2013
Editorial: Taylos & Francis
Cita bibliográfica: Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases (Currently known as Infectious Diseases). 2013; 45(9): 664-671
ISSN: Print: 2374-4235
Electronic: 2374-4243
Palabras clave: Coagulase-negative
Staphylococcus
Bacteraemia
Resumen: Background: Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are common contaminants in blood cultures (BC). A prospective study of patients with >_ 2 blood culture sets and at least 1 positive CoNS BC was performed to develop an algorithm to assist in determining the clinical significance of CoNS bacteraemia. Methods: A single reviewer examined the medical records of patients with CoNS bacteraemia (January– June 2010). The determination of clinical significance was made according to CDC/NHSN (US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network) criteria. To explore risk factors associated with clinical significance, a multivariate analysis was performed. The performances of various algorithms were then compared. An algorithm to assist in determining clinical significance was developed. Results: Two hundred and sixty-nine cases were included; 97 (36%) were considered clinically significant bacteraemia (CSB). Predictors of CSB in the multivariate analysis were: time to positivity < 16 h (odds ratio (OR) 4.540, 95% confidence interval (CI)1.734– 11.884), identification of Staphylococcus epidermidis (OR 4.273, 95% CI 2.124– 5.593), central venous catheter (OR 4.932, 95% CI 2.467– 9.858), > 2 CoNS-positive bottles from different BC sets (OR 1.957, 95% CI 1.401– 2.733), and Charlson score >_ 3 (OR 2.102, 95% CI 1.078– 4.099). The algorithm with best sensitivity (62%) and specificity (93%) for determining clinical significance of CoNS included Charlson score >_ 3, Pitt score >_ 1, neutropenic patients, presence of central venous catheter, identification of S. epidermidis, and time to positivity < 16 h. The positive predictive value was 83% and the negative predictive value was 81% (likelihood ratio 8.87). Conclusion: The use of this algorithm could potentially reduce the misclassifi cation of nosocomial bloodstream infections and inappropriate antibiotic treatment in patients for whom a positive CoNS does not represent a CSB.
Autor/es principal/es: García-Vázquez, Elisa
Fernández-Rufete, Ana
Hernández-Torres, Alicia
Canteras, Manuel
Ruiz, Joaquín
Gómez, Joaquín
Facultad/Departamentos/Servicios: Facultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Medicina Interna
Versión del editor: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/00365548.2013.797599
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10201/142864
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2013.797599
Tipo de documento: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Número páginas / Extensión: 8
Derechos: info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
Descripción: © 2013 Informa Healthcare.. This document is the published, version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Infectius Diseases. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2013.797599
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos: Medicina

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
When is coagulase-negative....pdf104,97 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir    Solicitar una copia


Los ítems de Digitum están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.