Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16122150

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorAlonso Sarría, Francisco-
dc.contributor.authorValdivieso Ros, Carmen-
dc.contributor.authorGomariz Castillo, Francisco-
dc.contributor.otherFacultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Geografía-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-03T10:09:04Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-03T10:09:04Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-13-
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing, 2024, Vol. 16 (12): 2150es
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 2072-4292-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/142824-
dc.description© 2024 by the authors. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This document is the Published version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Remote Sensing. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16122150-
dc.description.abstractThe availability of high spatial and temporal resolution imagery, such as that provided by the Sentinel satellites, allows the use of image time series to classify land cover. Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are a clear candidate for such an approach; however, the presence of clouds poses a difficulty. In this paper, random forest (RF) and RNNs are used to reconstruct cloud-covered pixels using data from other next in time images instead of pixels in the same image. Additionally, two RNN architectures are tested to classify land cover from the series, treating reflectivities as time series and also treating spectral signatures as time series. The results are compared with an RF classification. The results for cloud removal show a high accuracy with a maximum RMSE of 0.057 for RNN and 0.038 for RF over all images and bands analysed. In terms of classification, the RNN model obtained higher accuracy (over 0.92 in the test data for the best hyperparameter combinations) than the RF model (0.905). However, the temporal–spectral model accuracies did not reach 0.9 in any case.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent25es
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.relationGrant TED2021-131131B-I00 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by the European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR.es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectSentinel-2es
dc.subjectCloud removales
dc.subjectLSTMes
dc.subject.otherCDU::9 - Geografía e historiaes
dc.titleImagery time series cloud removal and classification using long short term memory neural networkses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/12/2150-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs16122150-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos: Geografía

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
2024_RemoteSensing.pdfOpen Access version16,74 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons