Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105067
Twittear
Título: | Aesthetic outcomes of different materials for delayed, single-tooth restorations for immediately placed implants. A randomized controlled clinical trial |
Fecha de publicación: | jul-2024 |
Editorial: | Elsevier |
Cita bibliográfica: | Journal of Dentistry, 2024, Vol. 146: 105067 |
ISSN: | Print: 0300-5712 |
Palabras clave: | Aesthetic outcomes Randomised controlled trial Dental implants White (WES) esthetic score Pink (PES) esthetic score Lithium disilicate Zirconium Single-tooth implants |
Resumen: | Objectives The aim of this study is to compare the aesthetic outcomes of metal porcelain (C), lithium disilicate (T1) and porcelain-layered zirconium (T2) immediate implant-supported single crowns in the anterior maxilla. Materials and methods Forty-five immediate dental implants were provided for 45 patients that required the extraction of a single tooth in the anterior maxilla. A temporary prosthesis was provided at 8 weeks after placement followed by the final prosthesis at 24 weeks post-implantation. The patients were randomly allocated into 3 groups: 15 patients in the control group (C) received a metal-porcelain restoration, 15 patients (T1) received a lithium disilicate (LD) restoration and 15 patients (T2) received a porcelain-layered, zirconium (Z) restoration. Pink (PES) and White (WES) esthetic scores, radiographic bone levels, periodontal parameters and patient's esthetic satisfaction using a visual analogue scale (VAS) were evaluated at the time of final restoration placement (t0) and at 12-months post-loading (t12). Results No implants were lost during the duration of this study. Statistically significant higher WES and VAS scores (p < 0.05) were recorded in T1 vs C and T1 vs T2 groups respectively. Similar radiographic bone levels and periodontal parameters were recorded in all groups. Conclusion Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that T1 restorations provided better WES outcomes when compared to C restorations and better VAS scores when compared to T2 restorations at 12 months post-loading. Besides, different material interphases did not have an impact in PES, bone levels or periodontal parameters. Clinical relevance There is limited data comparing aesthetic outcomes of implant supported single crowns made of different ceramic materials based on accepted and comparable indexes and the evaluation of the patient's perspective regarding these aesthetic outcomes. |
Autor/es principal/es: | Pardo Zamora, Guillermo Molina-González, Juan Manuel Martínez Marco, José Francisco Ortiz Ruiz, Antonio José Mardas, Nikos García-Sánchez, Rubén |
Facultad/Departamentos/Servicios: | Departamento Clínica Odontológica Integrada Infantil Facultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física |
Versión del editor: | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571224002367 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10201/142388 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105067 |
Tipo de documento: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Número páginas / Extensión: | 9 |
Derechos: | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
Descripción: | © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. This document is the Published version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Journal of Dentistry. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105067 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Artículos: Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0300571224002367-main.pdf | 4,22 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir Solicitar una copia |
Los ítems de Digitum están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.