Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2015.1120760

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorRamos Caro, Marina-
dc.contributor.otherFacultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Traducción e Interpretaciónes
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-22T07:32:33Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-22T07:32:33Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationPerspectives, 24(4), 2016: 606–634.es
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 0907-676X-
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1747-6623-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/141040-
dc.description©2016. This document is the Published, version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Perspectives. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2015.1120760-
dc.description.abstractAround the world, guidelines have been created to establish a clear procedure on how to create audio description. These put emphasis on the objectivity principle. However, in recent years this principle has been widely criticized, and a more narrative approach has been encouraged, although the reception of these opposing styles has not been compared experimentally. At the same time, while emotions play a central role in the filmic experience, the emotional reception of audio description in films has been tested on very few occasions. This paper analyses the differences in the emotional response to two audio description versions: a more objective version vs. a subjective version including metaphors, inferences, and subjective evaluation. We worked with 15 film scenes eliciting disgust, fear, and sadness to analyse how sighted and unsighted participants react at an emotional level. Emotions were measured by means of a Likert questionnaire and measurements of the heart rate. The results point to statistically significant differences between the versions in the case of fear and especially sadness, but not disgust.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent30es
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherTaylor & Francises
dc.relationTRANSCREA. Conceptualización y evaluación de la creatividad en traducción: aplicaciones docentes y profesionales (ref. 19238/PI/14). Fundación Seneca: Agencia de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Región de Murciaes
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses
dc.source: Screen translation-
dc.sourceAudio description-
dc.sourceEmotions-
dc.sourceReception-
dc.titleTesting audio narration: the emotional impact of language in audio descriptiones
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.embargo.termsSI-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2015.1120760-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos: Traducción e Interpretación

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
Perspective2016.pdf2,39 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de Digitum están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.