Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.149.1.12
![](/digitum/image/email_logo.png)
![](/digitum/image/logo-facebook.png)
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ortiz Sánchez, Juana | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ruiz de Ybáñez Carnero, María del Rocío | - |
dc.contributor.author | Abaigar, Teresa | - |
dc.contributor.author | Goyena, Marina | - |
dc.contributor.author | Espeso, Gerardo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cano, Mar | - |
dc.contributor.author | Alonso de Vega, Francisco | - |
dc.contributor.other | Facultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Sanidad Animal | es |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-09T11:14:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-04-09T11:14:56Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2001-07-07 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Veterinary Record, Vol. 149, N. 1, 2001, pp. 12-15 | es |
dc.identifier.issn | Print: 0042-4900 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | Electronic: 2042-7670 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10201/140642 | - |
dc.description | © 2001 British Veterinary Association. This document is the Published version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Veterinary Record. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.149.1.12 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Seven different methods of administering ivermectin to gazelles were compared: subcutaneous injection, direct oral administration, administration in individual feeds, administration in a herd feed, direct oral administration of a second ivermectin formulation, administration in individual water supplies, and administration in the herd's water supply. The first five treatments were effective, as monitored by faecal egg count reduction tests, and administration in individual feeds or in a herd feed avoided the need to capture the animals, with the attendant risk of mortality. Of the factors associated with the recipients (species, sex, age and inbreeding coefficient) age was the only significant factor for the efficacy of the treatment. Oral or subcutaneous, individual or collective, and direct or indirect administrations were equally satisfactory for the treatment of all the parasite groups studied. Only when parasitic problems were due to Nematodirus species did direct administration to individual animals appear to be preferable. | es |
dc.format | application/pdf | es |
dc.format.extent | 4 | - |
dc.language | eng | es |
dc.publisher | Wiley | - |
dc.relation | Sin financiación externa a la Universidad | es |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess | es |
dc.title | Effect of different methods of administration of ivermectin on its efficacy against the shedding of gastrointestinal nematode eggs by gazelles | es |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://bvajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1136/vr.149.1.12 | - |
dc.embargo.terms | SI | - |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.149.1.12 | - |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Artículos: Sanidad Animal |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Effect of different methods of administration of ivermectin on its efficacy against nematodes.pdf | 959,12 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() Visualizar/Abrir Solicitar una copia |
Los ítems de Digitum están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.