Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2023.2177460

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorBaixauli Soler, J. Samuel-
dc.contributor.authorLozano Reina, Gabriel-
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez Díez, Susana-
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Linarey Rey, Diego-
dc.contributor.otherFacultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Organización de Empresas y Finanzases
dc.contributor.otherFacultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresaes
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-18T10:08:41Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-18T10:08:41Z-
dc.date.issued2023-02-17-
dc.identifier.citationSpanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 2023es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/140281-
dc.description© 2023, The authors This document is made available under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc /4.0/ This document is the accepted version of a published work that appeared in final form in Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad To access the final work, see DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2023.2177460es
dc.description.abstractThe COVID-19 pandemic triggered a sudden drop in companies’ sales and turnover, which resulted in serious liquidity and solvency problems. In an effort to cushion these unfavourable effects, a credit guarantee plan was launched in 2020 by the Spanish Government to mitigate the effects of COVID-19 by injecting firms with liquidity. This paper seeks to analyse the impact of this public policy on SMEs’ optimal debt levels and to examine whether the allocation of this public funding has been efficiently targeted at those SMEs suffering temporary distress as a result of the pandemic. Based on a sample of 3,305 Spanish SMEs, our results show that the government’s interventionist policy swelled excess debt levels – mainly due to the increase in excess long-term debt – and deviated them from the optimum. Moreover, although these public guarantees should mostly have been aimed at SMEs experiencing a temporary decline due to COVID-19, we find that these SMEs were the least likely to receive liquidity injections.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent37es
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherTaylor & Francises
dc.relationThis work was supported by the Fundación Cajamurciaes
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectPublic guaranteeses
dc.subjectdebt levelses
dc.subjectallocation of public guaranteeses
dc.subjectgovernment interventionist policyes
dc.subjectCOVID-19 pandemices
dc.subjectICOes
dc.titleImpact of public guarantees on optimal debt levels following the COVID-19 pandemic: efficiency in their allocationes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.embargo.terms2024-07-17-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2023.2177460-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos: Organización de Empresas y Finanzas

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
Baixauli-Soler et al. (2023) SJFA.pdf493,19 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons