Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-020-00544-0

Título: Reproductive fluids, used for the in vitro production of pig embryos, result in healthy offspring and avoid aberrant placental expression of PEG3 and LUM
Fecha de publicación: 2021
Fecha de defensa / creación: 2021
Editorial: BMC
Cita bibliográfica: Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology (2021) 12:32
ISSN: 2049-1891
Materias relacionadas: CDU::6 - Ciencias aplicadas::61 - Medicina::612 - Fisiología
Palabras clave: Assisted reproductive technologies
Embryo transfer
In vitro embryo production
Placenta
Reproductive fluids
Resumen: Background: In vitro embryo production (IVP) and embryo transfer (ET) are two very common assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in human and cattle. However, in pig, the combination of either procedures, or even their use separately, is still considered suboptimal due to the low efficiency of IVP plus the difficulty of performing ET in the long and contorted uterus of the sow. In addition, the potential impact of these two ART on the health of the offspring is unknown. We investigated here if the use of a modified IVP system, with natural reproductive fluids (RF) as supplements to the culture media, combined with a minimally invasive surgery to perform ET, affects the output of the own IVP system as well as the reproductive performance of the mother and placental molecular traits. Results: The blastocyst rates obtained by both in vitro systems, conventional (C-IVP) and modified (RF-IVP), were similar. Pregnancy and farrowing rates were also similar. However, when compared to in vivo control (artificial insemination, AI), litter sizes of both IVP groups were lower, while placental efficiency was higher in AI than in RF-IVP. Gene expression studies revealed aberrant expression levels for PEG3 and LUM in placental tissue for C-IVP group when compared to AI, but not for RF-IVP group. Conclusions: The use of reproductive fluids as additives for the culture media in pig IVP does not improve reproductive performance of recipient mothers but could mitigate the impact of artificial procedures in the offspring.
Autor/es principal/es: París-Oller, E.
Navarro-Serna, S.
Soriano-Úbeda, C.
Lopes, J.S.
Matás, C.
Ruiz, S.
Latorre, L.
López-Albors, O.
Romar, R.
Cánovas, S.
Coy, P.
Facultad/Departamentos/Servicios: Facultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Fisiología
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10201/139234
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-020-00544-0
Tipo de documento: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Número páginas / Extensión: 12
Derechos: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Descripción: ©2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by /4.0/ This document is the Published, version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-020-00544-0
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos: Fisiología

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
Paris-Oller et al 2021_JASB_2.pdf1,26 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons