Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.198

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorLengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorCoulson, Seana-
dc.contributor.authorPagán Cánovas, Cristóbal-
dc.contributor.otherFacultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Filología Inglesa-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-11T08:35:17Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-11T08:35:17Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01-18-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Cognitive Semiotics, V(1-2) 2014: 198-219-
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 2235-2066-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/139221-
dc.description©2014. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This document is the Published, version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Cognitive Semiotics. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.198-
dc.description.abstractOne of the most broadly investigated topics in the conceptual metaphor literature is the importance of spatial construals for thinking and talking about time. We address the relationship between conceptual metaphor theory (CMT) and conceptual integration theory (CIT) by exploring how people understand timelines – both as graphical objects, in discourse about timelines taken from newspapers and the web, and in poetic examples. The inferential structure of the timeline is well captured by the conceptual metaphors TIME IS SPACE and EVENTS ARE OBJECTS. Instantiated graphically, the timeline serves as a material anchor for a conceptual integration network representing partial cognitive models of time, lines, objects, and a hybrid model known as a ‘blend’. Understood in respect to this network, the analogue properties of the line give it novel computational properties facilitating inferences about the events that the timeline represents. The history of the modern timeline suggests that it reflects a distributed cognitive process, involving multiple individuals over a large span of time and illustrating the importance of cultural evolution in the development of conceptual integration networks. Analysis of both poetry and everyday discourse about timelines suggests that conventional mapping schemas are best viewed not as determining the interpretation of timelines but as providing soft constraints that help guide interpretation. Future metaphor research will best proceed via a merger of techniques from CMT and CIT, characterizing metaphor as involving complex networks of mappings that can be updated flexibly as a function of context and goals.-
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent22-
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherDe Gruyter Mouton-
dc.relationThe European Commission’s Marie Curie International Outgoing Fellowship ‘The narrative lyric: Conceptual blending of spatial schemata with emotion in poetry and beyond’ (NARLYR: 235129).es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectCognitive artifacts-
dc.subjectCognitive semantics-
dc.subjectConceptual blending-
dc.subjectConceptual integration-
dc.subjectMaterial anchors-
dc.subjectMetaphor-
dc.titleUnderstanding Timelines: Conceptual metaphor and conceptual integrationes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.198/html-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.198-
Aparece en las colecciones:Artículos: Filología Inglesa

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción TamañoFormato 
Coulson and Pagán Cánovas - 2009 - Understanding timelines.pdf466,33 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons